ARTICLE
17 March 2016

FERC's Market Manipulation Rule: Impact On FTRs And The Virtual Market

This discussion should show us how to: Recognize the trading behavior related to FTRs and virtual bids that can trigger a FERC investigation.
United States Energy and Natural Resources
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Presented to: Energy Bar Association
Midwest Chapter Annual Meeting

Objectives

This discussion should show us how to:

  • Recognize the trading behavior related to FTRs and virtual bids that can trigger a FERC investigation
  • Understand the economics behind the potential manipulation of FTRs with virtual bids
  • Identify effective compliance policy regarding FTRs and virtual bids

Agenda

Behavior that can be Viewed as Manipulation

Economics of FTRs and Virtual Bids

Three types of behavior can trigger a manipulation

  • Outright fraud:

    • Informational Fraud: lying to the market

      • Example: submitting a false report
    • Fictitious Transactions: selling "snake oil"

      • Example: circular scheduling to increase congestion
  • Withholding:

    • Traditional concept of market power; reducing supply to increase price

      • Example: offering a unit above cost to increase LMPs
  • Uneconomic behavior:

    • Intentionally "losing money" on a trade or position to realize a gain on a benefiting position
    • "Losing money" in the economic sense, not accounting sense
    • Trades lose money all the time; proving intent poses challenges

      • Example: loss-making virtual bids that benefit an FTR position

To view the full presentation, please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More