ARTICLE
29 August 2024

Fifth Circuit Court Of Appeals Nixes DOL's Tip Rule

FH
Ford & Harrison LLP

Contributor

FordHarrison is a labor and employment firm with attorneys in 29 offices, including two affiliate firms. The firm has built a national legal practice as one of the nation's leading defense firms with an exclusive focus on labor law, employment law, litigation, business immigration, employee benefits and executive compensation.
The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision vacating the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) rule regarding tipped employees means the rule is no longer in effect nationwide.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Real World Impact: The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' recent decision vacating the U.S. Department of Labor's (DOL) rule regarding tipped employees means the rule is no longer in effect nationwide. This is a major victory for employers that have tipped employees and take a tip credit and have been beset by legal claims based on the rule.

Background

On August 23, 2024, in Restaurant Law Center and Texas Restaurant Association v. U.S. Department of Labor, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals unanimously vacated the DOL's rule regarding tipped employees that went into effect on December 28, 2021. The DOL rule provided that in order for an employer to claim a tip credit an employee can spend no more than 20 percent of time a week or more than 30 minutes straight on non-tipped work.

Court Decision

The Court determined that the rule violated the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) in two respects: (1) the rule is contrary to the Fair Labor Standards Act's (FLSA) clear statutory text and therefore not in accordance with law; and (2) the rule is arbitrary and capricious.

The Fifth Circuit relied on the recent U.S. Supreme Court opinion in Loper Bright Enters. v. Raimondo that eliminated the Chevron deference to agency interpretations. Now courts are free to decide legal questions by applying their own judgment.

The Court made clear that its holding did not address the validity of the dual-jobs regulation which was not challenged in the case and addresses situations where an employee regularly engages in distinct occupations for the same employer.

The Court's remedy was to vacate the DOL's rule which has nationwide effect. The DOL could petition the entire Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to rehear the case; however, that requires a majority of the Circuit Court's judges to agree to rehear the case. The DOL also could petition the U.S. Supreme Court to take the case on appeal.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More