ARTICLE
20 August 2019

The Ninth Circuit Withdraws Its Opinion Applying Dynamex Retroactively; Asks California Supreme Court To Decide Instead

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals changed its mind and decided to ask the California Supreme Court to decide whether the California Supreme
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals changed its mind and decided to ask the California Supreme Court to decide whether the California Supreme Court’s Dynamex decision should be applied retroactively.

In April 2018, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. Superior Court of Los Angeles, where the court set a new standard for determining whether a worker is an employee or an independent contractor. The court declined to answer whether this new rule applied retroactively.

The Ninth Circuit initially concluded the new Dynamex standard did apply retroactively in its decision in Vasquez v. Jan-Pro Franchising International, Inc., issued May 2. On July 22, the Ninth Circuit withdrew its opinion in Vasquez, deciding instead to certify the question to the California Supreme Court.

Once the question is certified to the California Supreme Court, the court has up to 90 days to decide whether to take the case.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More