NLRB Provides Hospitals And Other Employers Greater Control Over Their Private Property Available To The Public

FH
Ford & Harrison LLP

Contributor

FordHarrison is a labor and employment firm with attorneys in 29 offices, including two affiliate firms. The firm has built a national legal practice as one of the nation's leading defense firms with an exclusive focus on labor law, employment law, litigation, business immigration, employee benefits and executive compensation.
Executive Summary: In a 3-1 decision, the National Labor Relations Board ("NLRB" or the "Board") recently ruled that employers may prohibit nonemployee union representatives
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Executive Summary: In a 3-1 decision, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) recently ruled that employers may prohibit nonemployee union representatives from soliciting or promoting union membership within common areas of an employer’s business – such as public restaurants and cafeterias – as long as the employer does so in a non-discriminatory manner. See UPMC and its Subsidiary, UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside, Single Employer d/b/a UPMC Presbyterian Hospital and d/b/a UPMC Shadyside Hospital and SEIU Healthcare Pennsylvania CTW, CLC, Case 06-CA-102465 (June 14, 2019). This decision provides employers with greater control over the use of their facilities and explicitly overrules precedent inconsistent with this determination.

Background

Over 60 years ago, in NLRB v. Babcock, 351 U.S. 105 (1956), the Supreme Court ruled that employers may prohibit nonemployee union organizers from promoting their union on company property, as long as the union has other available channels of communication (i.e. the inaccessibility exception) and the employer prohibits similar promotions by other organizations (i.e. the discrimination exception). In the decades that followed, the Babcock standard developed another exception, the “public space” exception at issue in UPMC. The “public space” exception allowed nonemployee union organizers access to a portion of the employer’s private property open to the public, such as a cafeteria or restaurant. Specifically, nonemployee union organizers could not be denied access to employer cafeterias and restaurants open to the public so long as the organizers used the area in a fashion consistent with its intended use and were not disruptive.

The Board’s Decision in UPMC

In UPMC, two nonemployee union representatives sat in the hospital cafeteria with a group of employees and discussed union campaign matters. The union representatives displayed union flyers and pins on the tables where they were seated. After the union representatives had been in the cafeteria for over an hour, hospital security requested the nonemployee union representatives to leave, as the hospital had an established practice of removing nonemployees engaged in promotional activity in the cafeteria. The union representatives refused to leave and, eventually, six police officers escorted the union representatives out of the cafeteria.

Expressly overruling the “public space” exception to the Babcock standard, the Board ruled:

an employer does not have a duty to allow the use of its facility by nonemployees for promotional or organizational activity. The fact that a cafeteria located on the employer’s private property is open to the public does not mean that an employer must allow any nonemployee access for any purpose.

Furthermore, the Board held that the hospital did not run afoul of the Babcock discrimination exception because the hospital prohibited all nonemployees from engaging in promotional activities in its cafeteria, not just union organizers.

Bottom Line

The Board’s decision in UPMC provides employers with public spaces, such as restaurants and cafeterias, with greater control over their property. Employers with public spaces should consider reviewing their handbooks, policies, and practices to take advantage of this change in the law.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More