A recent New York Times article posited that “blind” hiring–where an employer keeps the hiring process blind as long as possible to eliminate any potential bias–may be the best method for increasing diversity in the workforce. Software like GapJumpers can give applicants tests that mimic what employees do on the job, and publish those test results to the potential employer without other data that might increase the potential for bias in the hiring process. The underlying premise is that employers rely too much on flawed human judgment when they recruit.
But does that work in every workplace? Not really. The demands of many positions cannot be reduced to a simple test. Moreover, it is critical for many positions that employees be personable, have good eye contact, be able to carry on a conversation with a client, and be able to communicate effectively, none of which can be measured by a simple computer-generated test.
That said, employers should minimize their reliance on extraneous factors that are not predictors of success, and may increase their risk of potential lawsuits from applicants who believe that they were unfairly denied a position because of their protected category. Interview questions that seek to elicit details about an applicant’s race, gender, marital status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation or any other protected category are not germane to the interviewing process and must be avoided. It is critical that anyone who is conducting interviews in an organization–whether of external or internal candidates–is trained in how to interview effectively to identify quality candidates and eliminate bias in the hiring process.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.