Colorado Supreme Court Plays Debbie Downer For Medical Pot Users

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
The wait is finally over. Employers in Colorado – and in other states with similar lifestyle laws – can breathe a sigh of relief following a recent ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The wait is finally over. Employers in Colorado – and in other states with similar lifestyle laws – can breathe a sigh of relief following a recent ruling by the Colorado Supreme Court. In Coats v. Dish Network, a quadriplegic employee who tested positive for marijuana during a random drug test challenged his discharge under his employer's zero tolerance policy. The employee claimed that because he used medical marijuana, pursuant to Colorado's Medical Marijuana Amendment, outside of work, his use was "lawful" under Colorado's "lawful activities statute," and thus protected from discipline.

Under Colorado's "lifestyle law," employers are prohibited from disciplining employees for engaging in "lawful" activity outside of work (with some limited exceptions). In upholding the discharge, the Colorado Supreme Court concluded that because marijuana use, whether for medical or recreational purposes, is still unlawful under federal law, the employee's use pursuant to Colorado law was not a lawful activity. Thus, private employers in Colorado are free to enforce their zero tolerance policies for marijuana even if a positive test results from medical marijuana use in compliance with Colorado state law.

The Colorado Supreme Court's ruling follows the lead of the Supreme Courts in California, Washington, and Oregon in rejecting job protection for medical marijuana use based on those states' laws. Two federal courts also came to the same conclusion regarding Michigan's Medical Marijuana Act.

However, employers should be cautioned not to get too high in celebrating this victory. Marijuana advocates in Colorado are likely to push for legislative action or a new ballot initiative to amend the Colorado Medical Marijuana Amendment to include protections for positive tests where the employee is not using, possessing or under the influence at work. Similar protections are already in place in Arizona, Delaware, and Minnesota. As Colorado has already legalized recreational marijuana and is seeing the tax revenue benefits from it, this victory for Colorado employers may be short lived.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More