ARTICLE
23 March 2015

Rauner Draws Battle Lines With Executive Order

FP
Fisher Phillips LLP

Contributor

Fisher Phillips LLP logo
Fisher Phillips LLP is a national law firm committed to providing practical business solutions for employers’ workplace legal problems. Labor and employment law is all the firm does, offering deep and broad knowledge and experience in the area of the law the attorneys know best. Fisher Phillips attorneys help clients avoid legal problems, are dedicated to providing exceptional client service, and are there when you need them. The firm has over 400 attorneys in 34 offices with 33 locations. Learn more at www.fisherphillips.com.
Steve Miller’s article "Rauner Draws Battle Lines with Executive Order" was featured in Chicago Daily Law on March 9, 2015.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Steve Miller’s article “Rauner Draws Battle Lines with Executive Order” was featured in Chicago Daily Law on March 9, 2015.

On Feb. 9, Gov. Bruce Rauner signed an executive order preventing unions representing state employees from collecting “fair share fees” from employees who are not union members.

The stated reason for that executive order, which reverses decades of law allowing the collection of those fees, is to permit every state employee to enjoy the freedoms of speech and association enshrined in the state and federal constitutions.

In the article, Steve discusses the reason for such a change in philosophy and how it relates to the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision Harris v. Quinn.

In Harris, Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr., writing for the majority, stated that “no person in this country may be compelled to subsidize speech by a third party that he or she does not wish to support” because “compelled funding of the speech of other private speakers or groups presents the same dangers as compelled speech.”

In sum, the Supreme Court found that paying dues to support an organization that makes political contributions, both in time and money, that do not support the employee’s political viewpoint can potentially violate that employee’s First Amendment rights.

To read the full article, please visit Chicago Daily Law. [subscription required]

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More