ARTICLE
25 March 2024

New York City Jumps Into The Non-Compete Fray

TC
Thompson Coburn LLP

Contributor

For almost 90 years, Thompson Coburn LLP has provided the quality legal services and counsel our clients demand to achieve their most critical business goals. With more than 380 lawyers and 40 practice areas, we serve clients throughout the United States and beyond.
In the wake of Governor Hochul's veto of a statewide ban on non-competition agreements, which we previously addressed, the New York City Council is considering three bills.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In the wake of Governor Hochul's veto of a statewide ban on non-competition agreements, which we previously addressed, the New York City Council is considering three bills.

The first, Int 0140-2024, broadly prohibits non-competes for all New York City "workers," defined as "a person who works, whether paid or unpaid, for an employer," including independent contractors. This bill not only bans future non-competes but also requires employers to rescind any non-competition agreement entered into before the local law became effective. The New York City Office of Labor Standards would be responsible for enforcement, and employers would be subject to a $500 civil penalty for each violation.

One of the other bills, Int 0146-2024, prohibits non-competes for "low-wage employees," defined as a "clerical and other worker," under New York Labor Law Section 190 (7), except those employed in a bona fide executive, administrative or professional capacity earning in excess of $1,300 each week. Significantly, employers would also be prohibited from entering into non-competes with potential employees who are not low-wage employees unless at the "beginning of the process for hiring such employee" the employer disclosed, in writing, that they may be subject to a non-compete. The New York City Office of Labor Standards would be responsible for enforcement, including the implementation of rules.

Finally, Int 0375-2024 would bar non-competes for "freelance workers" "hired or retained as an independent contractor by a hiring party," unless such covenant also contains a requirement for the hiring party to provide payment of a reasonable and mutually agreed upon sum to the freelance worker on a bi-weekly or monthly basis for the duration of time when the non-compete is in effect. Without such payment, the non-compete would be null and void. This bill includes a private right of action for freelance workers claiming to be aggrieved, enabling them to seek a declaratory judgment that the non-compete is void, attorneys' fees and statutory damages of $1,000.

We will continue to monitor developments. Stay tuned!

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More