Media Co. Settles Class Action Suit Alleging Costly 401(k) Funds

HB
Hall Benefits Law

Contributor

Strategically designed, legally compliant benefit plans are the cornerstone of long-term business stability and growth. As such, HBL provides comprehensive legal guidance on benefits in M&A, ESOPs, executive compensation, health and welfare benefits, retirement plans, and ERISA litigation matters. Responsive, relationship-driven counsel is the calling card of the Firm.
A media company has settled a class action lawsuit in which its workers alleged that it failed to negotiate lower investment expenses or properly monitor investment options.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A media company has settled a class action lawsuit in which its workers alleged that it failed to negotiate lower investment expenses or properly monitor investment options. Workers at Aegis Media Americas Inc., which Japanese international marketing firm Dentsu owns, accused it of violating its fiduciary duty under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) concerning the workers' $540 million 401(k) plan. The case is Kennedy et al. v. Aegis Media Americas Inc. et al., case number 1:20-cv-03624, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

According to Aegis workers, the company retained mutual funds with larger cost shares than similar offerings in the market, failing to discard them until late 2018. Workers also alleged that they paid excessive fees for T. Rowe Price funds that the plan offered. The workers accused the plan's governing committee of focusing on plan performance rather than completing due diligence on the accompanying management fees.

The Court paused the suit in September 2021 pending the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Hughes v. Northwestern University, in which the high Court ruled that plan administrators must act prudently in all – not just some – plan decision-making to avoid liability under ERISA.

Following the Hughes ruling, Aegis dismissed the suit, arguing that the workers failed to state a claim in enough detail. More specifically, they claimed the workers failed to show that cheaper investment options were better. However, the workers countered that the Hughes decision supported their case.

The federal district court judge denied Aegis' bid to dismiss the case and certified the class as requested by the workers, which led to the recent settlement.

HBL has experience in all areas of benefits and employment law, offering a comprehensive solution to all your business benefits and HR/employment needs. We help ensure you are in compliance with the complex requirements of ERISA and the IRS code, as well as those laws that impact you and your employees. Together, we reduce your exposure to potential legal or financial penalties.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More