Danger: Rocky Road Ahead!

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
Earlier this week, the Colorado state legislature voted to pass HB22-1317, which if signed into law by Democratic Governor Jared Polis, would place Colorado among several other states with the strictest bans...
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Colorado Poised to Dramatically Limit the Enforceability of Non-Competes and Other Restrictive Covenants for Low-Wage Workers

Earlier this week, the Colorado state legislature voted to pass HB22-1317, which if signed into law by Democratic Governor Jared Polis, would place Colorado among several other states with the strictest bans on restrictive covenant agreements for low-wage workers. A spokesperson for Governor Polis has already indicated that the governor plans to sign the bill. If executed, the bill would become effective 90 days after the legislature adjourns (early August 2022), so immediate and very substantial changes appear to be right around the Rocky Mountain road.

Key-Takeaways:

  1. Any restrictive covenant executed by a Colorado worker after the law's effective date will be deemed presumptively "void." This includes both non-compete and non-solicitation agreements. There are, however, several stated exceptions, which include: (a) restrictive covenants associated with the sale of business; (b) restrictive covenants executed by a "highly compensated worker" when the non-compete is no broader than reasonably necessary to protect trade secrets; and (c) restrictive covenants executed by workers earning sixty percent or more of the "highly compensated worker" threshold. Under the new law, a "highly compensated worker" is someone who is currently earning $101,250 per year or more. (NOTE: This figure is tied to the threshold set by the Colorado Department of Labor and will be modified annually.
  2. Confidentiality agreements still remain valid but can only be used if they do not prohibit disclosure of information arising from a worker's general training, knowledge, skill, or experience.
  3. In order for any restrictive covenant to be enforceable under the new law, the employer must provide sufficient notice of the restrictions. In cases of a prospective worker, notice must be provided before  they accept the offer of employment. In cases of a current  worker, notice must be provided at least 14-days before the earlier of the effective date of either the covenant or the additional consideration to be provided to the worker. (NOTE: The law spells out numerous steps employers must follow to provide proper "notice." These notices must: (a) be in writing and signed by the worker; (b) in a separate document with clear and conspicuous language; (c) include the agreement containing the non-compete; (d) identify the non-compete agreement by name and state that it contains a covenant that could restrict the worker's future employment options; and (e) direct the worker to the specific paragraphs of the non-compete agreement that contain the non-compete.
  4. If the worker in question primarily resided or worked in Colorado at the time their employment ends, any "choice-of-forum" clause in the non-compete agreement cannot require adjudication outside of Colorado. Additionally, in these situations, Colorado law must govern the enforceability of the non-compete agreement.
  5. Employers can be fined $5,000 per worker if they enter into, attempt to enforce, or present to any current or prospective worker a restrictive covenant that violates the new law. That said, the new law also gives Colorado judges full discretion to determine whether or not to issue a monetary penalty (or to issue a penalty less than $5,000), if the employer can successfully demonstrate that they acted in good faith and had reasonable grounds for believing they were not violating the new law.
  6. Workers and prospective workers, along with the Colorado Attorney General, may obtain injunctive relief if they demonstrate a violation of the new law. Workers and prospective workers, may also recover reasonable attorneys' fees and costs if they can establish the restrictive covenant(s) in question do not comply with the new law.

In the past six years, at least 10 states, as well as the District of Columbia, have passed legislation to limit and/or eliminate the use of non-competes and other restrictive covenants for low-wage workers. Colorado certainly appears poised to join that ever growing list. As such, all employers with workers in Colorado should take immediate steps to review their agreements to ensure they comply with the new law. Seyfarth will continue to monitor the situation and post additional updates on this blog as further developments occur.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More