ARTICLE
13 August 2024

CAS Legal Mailbag – 8/8/24

SG
Shipman & Goodwin LLP

Contributor

Shipman & Goodwin’s value lies in our commitment -- to our clients, to the profession and to the community. We have one goal: to help our clients achieve their goals. How we accomplish it is simple: we devote our considerable experience and depth of knowledge to understand each client’s unique needs, business and industry, and then we develop solutions to meet those needs. Clients turn to us when they need a trusted advisor. With our invaluable awareness of each client’s challenges, we can counsel them at every step -- to keep their operations running smoothly, help them navigate complex business transactions, position them for future growth, or resolve business disputes. The success of our clients is of primary importance to us and our attorneys invest meaningful time getting to know the client's business and are skilled in the practice areas and industry sectors critical to that success. With more than 175 attorneys in offices throughout Connecticut, New York and in Washington, DC, we serve the needs of
As the principal of a elementary school, I have to deal with a wide range of personalities. Most of the teachers in my school can handle the occasionally-disruptive student.
United States Consumer Protection
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Listen to this post

Originally appeared in the CAS Weekly Newsletter

Dear Legal Mailbag:

As the principal of a elementary school, I have to deal with a wide range of personalities. Most of the teachers in my school can handle the occasionally-disruptive student. However, one of my teachers is fragile, and she complains all the time that students just don't behave anymore. Last year was particularly difficult for her because one of her students suffered from oppositional defiance disorder. Rather than employing the de-escalation techniques she should use, this teacher's demands for compliance triggered this student's misbehavior on many occasions last year.

Apparently, this teacher heard about a statute passed in 2022 because she asked for a behavior intervention meeting of the crisis intervention team on eight different occasions last year. Conn. Gen. Stat. Section 10-236c provides that a classroom teacher may request a behavior intervention meeting of the school's crisis intervention team whenever a student engages in "behavior [that] has caused a serious disruption to the instruction of other students, or caused self-harm or physical harm to such teacher or another student or staff member in such teacher's classroom." While we questioned whether the student behavior she described in making those requests met the statutory standard, we went ahead and held a behavior intervention meeting each time.

As we look forward to a new school year, some members of the crisis intervention team have already expressed concern about these meetings and frustration with this teacher. Can I tell the teacher that we have had enough of these meetings and that she should handle these student disruptions on her own?

Just Deal With It

Dear Just:

A blanket denial of such requests is not permitted. However, you do have the right to question whether the misbehavior the teacher describes in requesting a behavior intervention meeting meets the statutory standard of being a serious disruption to the instruction of other students or caused self-harm or physical hard to someone in the teacher's classroom, as described above. That is a high standard, and you have the right to deny the teacher's request if you determine that the behavior does not rise to that level. In any event, Legal Mailbag suggests that you visit this teacher's classroom on a regular basis this coming year. If her interactions with students are triggering student misbehavior, you can send her for more training and eventually hold her accountable for her poor classroom management.

As you consider this matter, you should be aware that General Assembly significantly expanded the provisions of Section 10-236c in the last legislative session. Now, when a student engages in the behavior described above ("behavior [that] has caused a serious disruption to the instruction of other students, or caused self-harm or physical harm to such teacher or another student or staff member in such teacher's classroom"), a principal or other school administrator must notify the student's parents of that determination within twenty-four hours after such behavior occurs. The amended Section 10-236c goes on to say that "Such notice shall include, but not be limited to, informing such parent or guardian that the teacher of record in the classroom in which such behavior occurred may request a behavior intervention meeting" of the crisis intervention team.

The statute continues to provide that the classroom teacher may request a behavior intervention meeting in such cases, and, of course, you as principal can convene the crisis intervention team for that purpose on your own as you deem appropriate. In either event, the crisis intervention team must "identify resources and supports to address such student's social, emotional and instructional needs," and in accordance with amended Section 10-236c, it must now submit to the parent or guardian "a written summary of the meeting, including, but not limited to, the resources and supports identified" not later than seven days after the behavior intervention meeting is held.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More