US Corporate Law News: US Supreme Court Narrows Whistleblower Definition Under Dodd-Frank Act

WL
Withers LLP

Contributor

Trusted advisors to successful people and businesses across the globe with complex legal needs
US Supreme Court Narrows Whistleblower Definition Under Dodd-Frank Act
United States Consumer Protection
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On February 21, 2018, the United States Supreme Court narrowed the definition of "whistleblower" under The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, resolving a circuit split. In Digital Realty Trust, Inc. v. Somers, the Court ruled that, in order to receive protection under the Dodd-Frank Act's anti-retaliation provisions, a whistleblower must report concerns of securities law violations to the SEC, and that persons who only report such concerns internally within their organizations are not protected by such Dodd-Frank Act anti-retaliation provisions. The recent ruling applies only to the Dodd-Frank Act's whistleblower protections and not whistleblower protections under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, so that employees who only report concerns internally will still receive full whistleblower protection under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. For more information, see https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/17pdf/16-1276_b0nd.pdf.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More