Legal Specialists Weigh In After Karen Read Lawyers Seek Dismissal Of Two Charges

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
Special Counsel Daniel Conley recently spoke with The Boston Globe about the sensational murder trial surrounding Karen Read following her lawyers' motion to dismiss two charges against her that came after a July 1...
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Special Counsel Daniel Conley recently spoke with The Boston Globe about the sensational murder trial surrounding Karen Read following her lawyers' motion to dismiss two charges against her that came after a July 1 mistrial was declared.

The article writes: "Conley said the law currently states there's no verdict until it's read in open court, meaning the contention from Read's lawyers that the jury reached verdicts on two of the three charges is 'not a credible assertion.' As for holding a hearing to question individual jurors, Conley said, 'My instincts tell me no, she won't do that, because it really is invading the province of the jury.'"

SOURCE

The Boston Globe

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More