ARTICLE
30 July 2021

Federal Circuit Holds Board Of Directors As A Separate Entity

AM
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

Contributor

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP logo
Allen Matkins, founded in 1977, is a California-based law firm with more than 200 attorneys in four major metropolitan areas of California: Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, and San Francisco. The firm's areas of focus include real estate, construction, land use, environmental and natural resources, corporate and securities, real estate and commercial finance, bankruptcy, restructurings and creditors' rights, joint ventures, and tax; labor and employment, and trials, litigation, risk management, and alternative dispute resolution in all of these areas. For more information about Allen Matkins please visit www.allenmatkins.com.
We often hear about a board of directors being sued, but can a plaintiff really sue a corporation's board?
United States Corporate/Commercial Law

We often hear about a board of directors being sued, but can a plaintiff really sue a corporation's board?   According to a recent decision by the Federal Circuit,  a plaintiff can't sue a board, at least not as a separate entity in federal court:

Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for parties other than an individual or corporation, their capacity to be sued is determined "by the law of the state where the court is located," here, California.  Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(b).  The Supreme Court of California has not addressed whether a corporation's board of directors may be sued as a legal entity separate from the corporation itself.  But California's Corporation Code only identifies a corporation or association as entities that may be sued.  Cal. Corp. Code § 105; seeTheta Chi Fraternity, Inc. v. Leland Stanford Junior Univ.,212 F. Supp. 3d 816, 821 (N.D. Cal. 2016).  We are persuaded that, under California law, a plaintiff may not sue a corporation's board of directors as an entity separate from the corporation.

Siegler v. Sorrento Therapeutics,

Inc., U.S. Ct. of Appeals  Case No. 2020-1435 (Fed. Cir. July 20, 2021).  The plaintiff argued, albeit unsuccessfully, that Section 14 of the Clayton Act provided the requisite authority.  The Federal Circuit pointed out that the statute imposed liability on individual  directors and was criminal, not civil.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More