California Bill Requires AG Approval Without Regard To Geographic Or Constitutional Limits

AM
Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP

Contributor

Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP logo
Allen Matkins, founded in 1977, is a California-based law firm with more than 200 attorneys in four major metropolitan areas of California: Los Angeles, Orange County, San Diego, and San Francisco. The firm's areas of focus include real estate, construction, land use, environmental and natural resources, corporate and securities, real estate and commercial finance, bankruptcy, restructurings and creditors' rights, joint ventures, and tax; labor and employment, and trials, litigation, risk management, and alternative dispute resolution in all of these areas. For more information about Allen Matkins please visit www.allenmatkins.com.
According to Vergil, Jupiter granted imperium sine fine (rule without limit) to the yet to be birthed City of Rome . Aeneid, Book 1, line 279.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

According to Vergil, Jupiter granted imperium sine fine (rule without limit) to the yet to be birthed City of Rome . Aeneid, Book 1, line 279. As far as I know, no divinity has made a similar bequest upon the State of California. Nonetheless, a bill now pending in the California legislature would seemingly grant such limitless authority to the California Attorney General with respect to health care related merger and acquisition transactions. See California Bill Would Require Prior Attorney General Approval Of These "Material" M&A Agreements.

If enacted, AB 2080 would, among other things, require a medical group, hospital or hospital system, health facility (as specified), health plan, health insurer, or pharmacy benefit manager (except as specified) to provide written notice to, and obtain written consent of, the Attorney General before entering into an agreement or transaction to either (i) sell, transfer, lease, exchange, option, encumber, convey, or otherwise dispose of a material amount of its assets; or (ii) transfer control, responsibility, or governance of a material amount of its assets.

Professor Stephen Bainbridge called to my attention that such a requirement could run afoul of the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. In Edgar v. Mite, 457 U.S. 624 (1982), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down Illinois' Business Takeover Act because it purported to regulate directly and to interdict interstate commerce, including commerce wholly outside the state of California. Being devoid of any in-state limitation, AB 280 could face a similar constitutional attack if enacted.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More