Court Refuses Appointment Of A Custodian Under DGCL Section 226(a)(3) To Continue Defunct Corporation

Barry Klayman and Mark Felger, writing in the Delaware Business Court Insider, discuss a recent decision in the Delaware Court of Chancery refusing to appoint a custodian pursuant...
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Barry Klayman and Mark Felger, writing in the Delaware Business Court Insider,  discuss a recent decision in the Delaware Court of Chancery refusing to appoint a custodian pursuant to Delaware General Corporation Law Section 226(a)(3) to continue the business of a defunct corporation. Although the vice chancellor denied the petition based on the language of the statute, his opinion appears to abandon the court's previous policy against permitting the revival of defunct Delaware corporations for use as blank check companies.

To read the article, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More