ARTICLE
20 March 2019

Application Rejected: Supreme Court Requires Registration To Commence Copyright Infringement Suit

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
In Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, the Supreme Court settled the long unresolved question of whether registration ...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, the Supreme Court settled the long unresolved question of whether registration or simply the application for registration is required to commence a suit for copyright infringement. In a unanimous decision authored by Justice Ginsburg, the high court ruled that a copyright owner cannot pursue infringement claims in court until the Copyright Office has registered the work at issue.

The decision resolves a long-standing circuit split over the meaning of the Copyright Act's "registration" requirement. Some courts, notably in the Fifth and Ninth Circuits, permitted copyright owners to sue for infringement as soon as the application for registration (along with the appropriate fee and deposit copy of the work) was filed with the Copyright Office. Other courts, however, like those in the Tenth and Eleventh Circuits, relied on the plain language of the Copyright Act to hold that the Copyright Office must determine that copyright protection is warranted before registration occurs under the Copyright Act.

Rejecting numerous policy arguments from the likes of the Recording Industry Association of America and the Authors Guild, Justice Ginsburg writes in the opinion that the "registration approach" is the "only satisfactory reading" of the Copyright Act. While acknowledging that the time to process registration applications has increased from weeks to months over the years, Justice Ginsburg noted that this was a problem that "courts cannot cure" and administrative delay does not permit a court to "revise ... congressionally composed text."

While the decision brings welcome clarity on the prerequisites for bringing an infringement suit, it is controversial in that owners of time-sensitive works, such as photojournalism (and photojournalists have been responsible for a welter of copyright litigation over the past few years), must wait several months before pursuing any infringement that has potentially already devalued the works during that time period. Perhaps acknowledging this concern, Justice Ginsburg notes that preregistration is available for certain works being prepared for release. Preregistration, however, is only available for works susceptible to pre-release infringement, such as motion pictures, musical compositions, sound recordings, computer programs, video games, books and marketing photographs.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More