ARTICLE
23 September 2014

Transformative Use: Danger Is in the Definition

In April, 2013 the 2nd Circuit concluded that certain works of the well-known appropriation artist, Richard Prince, which used Patrick Cariou’s photographs in a series of collages, constituted fair use.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In April, 2013 the 2nd Circuit concluded that certain works of the well-known appropriation artist, Richard Prince, which used Patrick Cariou's photographs in a series of collages, constituted fair use. In Kienitz v. Sconnie Nation LLC, U.S. Circuit Judge Frank Easterbrook joins in on criticism that courts, such as in the Cariou case, are placing too much emphasis on the transformative use factor in considering fair use. However, LAW 360 (subscription required) quotes Reed Smith's Brad Newberg who zeroes in on a deeper danger for authors' derivative rights: "The issue with Cariou is not that it gives great weight to a transformative use, but how it defines transformative use."

This article is presented for informational purposes only and is not intended to constitute legal advice.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More