ARTICLE
24 April 2023

United States v. Danske Bank: New Theory Of Liability For Violation Of US AML Standards

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
This Article discusses the recent plea agreement between the United States and Danske Bank. It argues that the Department of Justice has advanced a new and evolving theory of liability...
United States Compliance
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

This Article discusses the recent plea agreement between the United States and Danske Bank. It argues that the Department of Justice has advanced a new and evolving theory of liability for foreign banks that access the U.S. financial system through correspondent banking relationships. This theory of liability has expansive extraterritorial reach because such foreign banks provide extensive representations about their anti-money laundering and sanctions compliance programs at account opening and on an ongoing basis. If those representations are deemed false, they could be the basis of criminal liability if supported by other elements of bank fraud — even if the foreign bank has no subsidiary, branch, or other presence in the United States.

Click here to continue reading . . .

Originally Published by The Review of Banking and Financial Services

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More