Increased Commodities Enforcement Leads To CFTC Guidance And New DOJ Fraud Unit

JD
Jones Day

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
On May 20, 2020, the CFTC announced that for the first time since 1994 the Division of Enforcement ("Division") issued new guidance regarding the factors it considers in recommending...
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On May 20, 2020, the CFTC announced that for the first time since 1994 the Division of Enforcement ("Division") issued new guidance regarding the factors it considers in recommending civil monetary penalties to the CFTC. In introducing these measures, Director of Enforcement James McDonald stated: "[t]ransparency in our procedures, and in particular how we think about penalties, promotes fairness and enhances respect for the rule of law." The new guidance outlines the following three-pronged approach the Division follows when making its recommendation:

  • Gravity of the Violation. When weighing the gravity of the violation, the Division evaluates factors including the respondent's role in the violations and state of mind, including whether the conduct was intentional. The Division will also consider the consequences resulting from the violations.
  • Mitigating and Aggravating Circumstances. For this prong, the Division will consider any mitigating circumstances surrounding the respondent's conduct, such as self-reporting the violation, the extent of the respondent's cooperation, and any attempts to alleviate the violation by returning victim funds or improving a compliance program. Conversely, the Division will also consider any aggravating circumstances surrounding the respondent's conduct, such as any acts of concealment, obstruction, or prior misconduct.
  • Other Considerations. Lastly, the Division may consider other factors when making its penalty recommendation, such as a timely settlement and any sanctions that may be imposed in parallel actions by other civil or criminal authorities or self-regulatory agencies.

It has also been recently reported that the DOJ has created a new sub-unit of the fraud division specializing in combating commodities fraud. This new unit will be overseen by Avi Perry, a trial attorney who has prosecuted several recent high profile cases against financial institutions. The sub-unit is part of the DOJ's broader initiative to expand the scope of its criminal prosecutions for manipulative practices in the commodities markets, including spoofing.

The new CFTC Guidance and DOJ fraud unit represent significant steps in the enforcement and prosecution of the federal commodities laws.

Originally published 28 May, 2020

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Increased Commodities Enforcement Leads To CFTC Guidance And New DOJ Fraud Unit

United States Finance and Banking

Contributor

Jones Day is a global law firm with more than 2,500 lawyers across five continents. The Firm is distinguished by a singular tradition of client service; the mutual commitment to, and the seamless collaboration of, a true partnership; formidable legal talent across multiple disciplines and jurisdictions; and shared professional values that focus on client needs.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More