ARTICLE
22 August 2017

CFTC Grants Certain CPOs Relief From Registration And Reporting Requirements

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The DSIO determined that the parties are "jointly and severally liable" for violations of the CEA and CFTC regulations.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The CFTC Division of Swap Dealer and Intermediary Oversight ("DSIO") granted exemptive relief to several commodity pool operators ("CPO") in response to requests for no-action relief related to certain CPO registration and reporting requirements under the Commodity Exchange Act.

No-action letters were issued in connection with criteria instituted by prior CFTC Letter 14-126, published in October 2014, which exempted certain persons from CPO registration requirements if they delegated CPO responsibilities to another person registered as a CPO. To qualify for relief under CFTC Letter 14-126, the "delegating CPO" and "designated CPO" were required to meet a series of nine criteria (see previous coverage). CFTC Letters 17-38, 17-39, 17-40, and 17-42 were issued in response to requests for relief for CPOs that met all criteria for exemption from registration except for criterion 6 ("If the Delegating CPO and the Designated CPO are each a non-natural person, then one such CPO controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the other CPO."). The DSIO determined that the parties are "jointly and severally liable" for violations of the CEA and CFTC regulations. As a result, the DSIO decided that relief from registration requirements (under CEA Section 4m(1)) is justified.

In CFTC Letter 17-41, the DSIO granted exemptive relief from the annual report filing requirement for a certain pool that operates as part of a master-feeder structure pursuant to an exemption under CFTC Rule 4.7(b)(3) (see previous coverage of similar relief granted in May 2017). The relief allows the CPO to file a 14-month combined annual report (covering the period of January 1, 2016 to March 31, 2017) in lieu of the 4.7(b)(3) requirement that CPOs must distribute a report for each fiscal year within 90 days of (i) the end of the fiscal year or (ii) the date of permanent cessation of trading, whichever is earlier.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More