After Approval At DC District Court, Appeals Court Halts Trading Event Contracts Based On Election Outcomes

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.

Explore Firm Details

On 12 September 2024, the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in KalshiEx LLC v. CFTC that designated contract markets may list event contracts whose payouts are tied to the outcome of elections.

United States Finance and Banking

On 12 September 2024, the US District Court for the District of Columbia ruled in KalshiEx LLC v. CFTC that designated contract markets may list event contracts whose payouts are tied to the outcome of elections. The court's order, which granted summary judgment to KalshiEx LLC (Kalshi), held that the Commodity Futures Trading Commission's (CFTC) interpreted its own regulations too broadly and that registered derivatives exchanges such as Kalshi may offer election outcome event contracts for trading.

Immediately following the District Court's ruling, the CFTC appealed and moved to stay the lower court's order. The Court of Appeals granted the motion to stay, effectively halting trading of elections outcome event contracts. For a brief period, elections outcome event contracts were traded on Kalshi's registered derivatives exchange.

Event contracts, or "binary options," allow market participants to take a market view on the outcome of an event. If the conditions of the event are met, the "yes" contract holders (those who bought the long position) are profitable, and the "no" contract holders (those who bought the short position) lose the amount used to collateralize the contract, and the reverse holds true if the conditions of the event are not met. The underlying event of the event contracts at issue in KalshiEx related to which political party—Democrat or Republican—has control of each house of Congress as of 1 February 2025.

Kalshi relied on CFTC regulations to self-certify that its election outcome event contracts conformed with CFTC regulations and the derivative exchange's own listing standards. The CFTC opposed listing such contracts, arguing they involved "gaming" and were "contrary to the public interest" and therefore Kalshi was prohibited from listing them on its derivatives exchange under the Commodity Exchange Act and related CFTC regulations. The court held that "gaming" requires a game, and that, while these contracts involve "elections, politics, Congress, and party control" they do not "bear any relation to any game."

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.