ARTICLE
6 September 2016

California Federal Court Dismisses Class Action Against Southwest

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
A class action was commenced against Southwest Airlines Co. ("Southwest") based upon a purported "hidden exception" in Southwest's ticketing policy.
United States Transport
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A class action was commenced against Southwest Airlines Co. ("Southwest") based upon a purported "hidden exception" in Southwest's ticketing policy. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged that Southwest has a policy allowing its customers to cancel non-refundable tickets and use the amount paid for those tickets as a credit for future travel within one year from the original date of purchase, but that a "hidden exception" causes customers to lose the credit in less than one year when they purchase future travel on Southwest using both cash and Southwest credit. The plaintiffs allege that, if the future travel purchased using both cash and credit is then cancelled, credit for the entire purchase (and not just the portion of the ticket purchased with the initial credit) is only available for one year from the date of the earlier purchase. 

The Northern District of California dismissed the plaintiffs' claims for fraud, negligence, and unjust enrichment, finding the claims preempted by the Airline Deregulation Act ("ADA"). The ADA prohibits a state from enacting or enforcing laws and regulations "related to a price, route, or service of an air carrier...." 49 U.S.C. § 41713(b)(1). The court first found that plaintiffs' claims regarding Southwest credits were connected to both Southwest's rates and services and, therefore, were preempted by the ADA. The court also dismissed the plaintiffs' claims after finding that they did not solely arise from a contract with Southwest but arose from obligations in regulations beyond the scope of the contract. 

Shrem v. Southwest Airlines Co., 2016 WL 410462 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2016).

California Federal Court Dismisses Class Action Against Southwest

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More