Federal Law Preempts State Common Law Claims Against Former Owner Of Airliner Involved In Multi-Fatality Accident In Cuba

SH
Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP

Contributor

Schnader is a full-service law firm of 160 attorneys with offices in Pennsylvania, New York, California, Washington, D.C., New Jersey, Delaware and an affiliation with a law firm in Jakarta. We provide businesses, government entities, and nonprofit organizations throughout the world with innovative, practical, and cost-effective solutions to their business and litigation needs. We also provide wealth management and an array of personal legal services to individuals.
In addition to suing the airline and the aircraft manufacturer, among others, the plaintiffs sued a former owner of the aircraft, Wells Fargo Trust Company.
United States Transport
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On May 18, 2018, a 39-year-old Boeing 737 aircraft leased by a Mexican company and operated by Cuba's flagship carrier, Cubana, crashed shortly after takeoff near Havana; 112 people were killed in this tragic accident.

In addition to suing the airline and the aircraft manufacturer, among others, the plaintiffs sued a former owner of the aircraft, Wells Fargo Trust Company. Wells Fargo had purchased the aircraft in 2005, and sold it to a Mexican company in 2008, approximately ten years before the accident. Wells Fargo asserted that it had not possessed or controlled the aircraft during the three years of its ownership, between 2005 and 2008.

The plaintiffs alleged that when Wells Fargo sold the aircraft in 2008, it was "defective and unreasonably dangerous" and "had defects in the flight control surfaces, the rudder and rudder control system, the rudder power control unit rods, the aircraft stabilizer, and more generally, the engine." The plaintiffs also alleged that Wells Fargo "bought and sold the plane without including any warnings about the effect of aging on the plane," and was liable because of "failure to correct, remedy and repair the dangerous and defective conditions," for selling the aircraft "in an unsafe condition," and for "negligent failure to inspect and discover" the alleged defects and dangerous conditions.

Wells Fargo filed a Federal Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss on various grounds, including its contention that the plaintiffs' state common law tort claims were preempted under a provision of the Federal Aviation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 44112, which in a section entitled "Limitation of Liability" shields "owners and lessors from personal-injury liability if they did not have actual possession or operational control of the plane." Specifically, the statute provides as follows:

(b) Liability.—A lessor, owner, or secured party is liable for personal injury, death, or property loss or damage only when a civil aircraft, aircraft engine or propeller is in the actual possession or operational control of the lessor, owner, or secured party, and the personal injury, death or property loss or damage occurs because of—

  • the aircraft, engine, or propeller; or
  • the flight of, or an object falling from, the aircraft, engine or propeller.

In granting the motion to dismiss and finding that the plaintiffs' state common law claims were preempted and barred under federal law, the court rejected the plaintiffs' contention that the statute did not apply because the plaintiffs purportedly were suing Wells Fargo "as a seller of the plane – not as an owner or lessor." The court held that "as a matter of law, affixing the 'seller' label to Wells Fargo makes no substantive difference," reasoning that if "non-possessory, non-operating owners, lessors or security interest holders of an aircraft could be held liable after selling it, then that would shrink the supply of financiers for aircraft."

Finally, in granting the motion to dismiss without prejudice, the court stated that the plaintiffs "may propose an amendment to the complaint if they believe that preemption can be avoided with new allegations."

J.A.G.P. v. Aerolineas Damojh, S.A/ de C.V., 2022 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 24858 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 11, 2022).

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Federal Law Preempts State Common Law Claims Against Former Owner Of Airliner Involved In Multi-Fatality Accident In Cuba

United States Transport

Contributor

Schnader is a full-service law firm of 160 attorneys with offices in Pennsylvania, New York, California, Washington, D.C., New Jersey, Delaware and an affiliation with a law firm in Jakarta. We provide businesses, government entities, and nonprofit organizations throughout the world with innovative, practical, and cost-effective solutions to their business and litigation needs. We also provide wealth management and an array of personal legal services to individuals.
See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More