On October 30, 2002, the Federal Trade Commission, the Antitrust Division and the European Commission released a set of "best practices" for the coordination of future merger reviews. The guidelines institutionalize a number of practices already informally in use between the US and the EU, thereby confirming the agencies’ commitment to enhancing their cooperation and providing merger parties with useful guidance in the review process.
The US and EU antitrust agencies will apply the guidelines to transactions which they simultaneously review. From the standpoint of merging parties, it is anticipated that such coordination will be sought primarily in sizeable transactions certain to get attention from both the European Commission and the US antitrust authorities.
The objectives of the "best practices" are to:
- promote fully-informed decision-making and enhance the efficiency of investigations;
- minimize the risk of divergent outcomes and incoherent remedies;
- reduce the burden on parties participating in merger investigations;
- and increase public confidence in and overall transparency of the merger review processes.
The "best practices" include:
- Coordination in the timing of reviews:
- The agencies will try to synchronize their investigation timetables, by keeping one another apprised of important developments in their respective review processes.
- Merging parties may in certain cases be afforded an opportunity to confer with the EU and US agency staffs jointly to discuss timing issues, preferably as soon as possible after the announcement of the transaction.
- Coordination in the collection and evaluation of evidence:
- The agencies may share publicly available information, coordinate their information or discovery requests and, consistent with their confidentiality and non-disclosure obligations, discuss their respective analyses as well as necessary remedial measures.
- Merging parties and third parties may be requested to execute waivers of confidentiality to enable more complete communication between the agencies regarding evidence, thereby helping to avoid divergent analyses and outcomes.
- Improved communication between agencies:
- The agencies should immediately contact one another upon learning of a transaction likely to require substantial cooperation between the US and the EU, and designate a contact person responsible for coordination with the other agency.
- The relevant investigative staff of each agency should seek to agree from the outset on a schedule for regular conferences and consultations between them on the progress of their investigations.
- Consultations may also occur between senior competition officials in the US and the EU at key moments of one another’s investigations.
- Facilitation of compatible remedies/settlements:
- The agencies should strive to ensure that the remedies they accept do not impose inconsistent obligations upon the merging parties or negatively impact the other jurisdiction’s review.
- Therefore, consistent with their confidentiality obligations, the reviewing agencies should keep one another informed of remedy offers being considered and, where appropriate, share, discuss and comment on draft remedy proposals or settlement papers.
- The merging parties should also coordinate the timing and substance of their remedy proposals.
- In 2003, the US-EU Merger Working Group - the group of lawyers and economists from each agency who developed the "best practices" - will focus on competitive effects in oligopolistic markets and the evaluation of efficiencies, in a sustained effort to promote convergence between the US and EU on merger policy.
The Antitrust Legal Alert is a bulletin of new developments and is not intended as legal advice or as an opinion on specific facts. For further information about any of the presentation topics, or to obtain copies of any of the presented materials, please contact any of the