ARTICLE
29 August 2024

FTC Pursues Auto Dealer For Misleading Pricing And Other Illegal Practices

GA
Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)

Contributor

With firms representing more than 90 countries, each GALA member has the local expertise and experience in advertising, marketing and promotion law that will help your campaign achieve its objectives, and navigate the legal minefield successfully. GALA is a uniquely sensitive global resource whose members maintain frequent contact with each other to maximize the effectiveness of their collaborative efforts for their shared clients. GALA provides the premier worldwide resource to advertisers and agencies seeking solutions to problems involving the complex legal issues affecting today's marketplace.
The Federal Trade Commission announced that it reached a $2.6 million settlement with Arizona-based Coulter Motor Company, resolving allegations that the auto dealer deceived consumers about its prices and engaged...
United States Arizona Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In the case, the FTC alleged that the company advertised cars online at significant discounts from the car's suggested retail prices, but that when consumers arrived at the dealership, they were told that those prices were not available. The FTC also alleged that the dealer added a variety of "junk fees" to increase the prices consumers would have to pay, including so-called "market adjustments," add-ons for pre-installed features, and other miscellaneous fees. In addition, the FTC alleged that the dealer discriminated against Latino consumers in vehicle transactions by charging them more in interest and add-on charges than others.

In the announcement of the case, Samuel Levine, the Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection, said, "Coulter used junk fees and other illegal tactics to drive up prices for consumers, especially Latino consumers. The FTC will continue cracking down on practices that drive up prices, cheat consumers, and undercut honest sellers."

Interestingly, although the vote to bring the case and enter into the settlement was 5-0, Commissioners Melissa Holyoak and Andrew N. Ferguson issued Concurring and Dissenting Statements, raising questions about the the extent of the FTC's authority here to pursue discrimination-related claims. Commissioner Holyoak, for example, wrote "Absent Congressional authorization, the Commission should not attempt to broaden the FTC's unfairness consumer protection authority into a comprehensive civil rights authority –- a new standard of liability that may have unintended and pernicious consequences."

What are some important take-aways here? First, the FTC clearly has its eye on auto dealers. So, if you're selling cars, this is a great time to revisit your advertising practices to ensure that they're in line with FTC (and applicable state) standards. Second, the FTC's focus on "junk fees" continues. If you're advertising a price to consumers, it had better the price that consumers are actually going to pay. If you're planning on tacking on a lot of unexpected fees later on, you're setting yourself up for an unwelcome call from the FTC. And, finally, while there may be some disagreement about the scope of the FTC's authority, we've certainly seen the FTC, in recent years, focus on how deceptive practices can be used to target specific communities. There's no doubt that this focus will continue.

{

"The FTC will continue cracking down on practices that drive up prices, cheat consumers, and undercut honest sellers"

1510314.jpg

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More