Post-Sale Communications Can Be Advertising Claims

FK
Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz

Contributor

Frankfurt Kurnit provides high quality legal services to clients in many industries and disciplines worldwide. With leading practices in entertainment, advertising, IP, technology, litigation, corporate, estate planning, charitable organizations, professional responsibility and other areas — Frankfurt Kurnit helps clients face challenging legal issues and meet their goals with efficient solutions.
The court refused to dismiss the case, holding that the product claims could be actionable commercial statements.
United States Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Last week, a federal district court in Texas held that product claims that an advertiser makes to a consumer after the consumer has already purchased the product could still be considered to be advertising claims.

Boltex Manufacturing v. Galperti involves a dispute between two manufacturers of carbon steel flanges. Plaintiff Boltex alleged that defendant Galperti stamped its products as having been "normalized" and included documentation with the product that made this claim as well.  ("Normalization" means that the flanges went through a heat treatment process to increase their machinability and toughness).  Boltex alleged that Galperti's flanges were not actually "normalized," however. 

Boltex sued, alleging that Galperti's claims violated the Lanham Act.  Galperti moved to dismiss on various grounds, including that its statements were not actionable under the Lanham Act.  Galperti argued that the statements were "post-sale communications to consumers who have already purchased a product," not advertising claims that influenced a consumer to buy the product.  

The court refused to dismiss the case, holding that the product claims could be actionable commercial statements.  The court appears to find that the post-sale statements may be actionable because they confirm consumers' beliefs about the qualities of the product, causing them not to return the product. 

For further interesting analysis about this case, check out Rebecca Tushnet's blog post about it. 

http://tushnet.blogspot.com/2018/04/post-sale-statements-that-prevent

www.fkks.com

This alert provides general coverage of its subject area. We provide it with the understanding that Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz is not engaged herein in rendering legal advice, and shall not be liable for any damages resulting from any error, inaccuracy, or omission. Our attorneys practice law only in jurisdictions in which they are properly authorized to do so. We do not seek to represent clients in other jurisdictions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More