Denmark Has Failed In Its Attempt To Bring A Civil Claim In The UK Against A Hedge Fund Trader Accused Of Involvement In The Cum-Ex Share Selling Scandal

RR
Rahman Ravelli Solicitors

Contributor

Rahman Ravelli is known for its sophisticated, bespoke and robust representation of corporates, senior business executives and professionals in national and international matters.
It is one of the fastest-growing and most highly-regarded, market-leading legal practices in its field. This is due to its achievements in criminal and regulatory investigations and large-scale commercial disputes involving corporate wrongdoing and multi-jurisdictional enforcement, and its asset recovery, internal investigations and compliance expertise.
The firm’s global reach, experienced litigators and network of trusted partner firms ensure it can address legal matters for clients anywhere in the world. It combines astute business intelligence and shrewd legal expertise with proactive, creative strategies to secure the best possible outcome for all its clients.
Rahman Ravelli’s achievements in certain cases have even helped shape the law. It is regularly engaged by other law firms to provide independent advice.

Syed Rahman of financial crime specialists Rahman Ravelli considers the case's implications.
European Union Criminal Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Syed Rahman of financial crime specialists Rahman Ravelli considers the case's implications.

Danish tax officials had their £1.5 billion Cum-Ex lawsuit against trader Sanjay Shah thrown out by a UK court.

The High Court ruled that that the UK was not the proper place to bring a foreign tax claim. The Danish tax agency said it would appeal the decision.

The civil case is one of a number of routes Denmark is taking in an attempt to regain the huge tax rebates it said it paid to Shah and others who used Cum-Ex share trading to gain millions of euros in tax refunds. More than two dozen bankers, traders and lawyers have been charged in Denmark and Germany over Cum-Ex.

The High Court's decision is a blow for the Danish tax agency, which had spent more than $100 million on lawsuits in various countries related to Cum-Ex. The agency has admitted it is "very surprised'' by the ruling, which it "fundamentally disagrees'' with.

But despite Denmark's criticism of the decision, this case is set to have serious implications for any ongoing or future investigations into financial institutions and individuals who operated out of London and carried out dividend arbitrage schemes in European countries.

With capital markets being global and cross-border share trading taking place in a split second, it is a huge task for any one country to investigate what happened. Unless an appropriate framework is put in place to reflect this, there may be other civil or criminal Cum-Ex cases that prove to be unsuccessful.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More