The Assertion Of Extraterritorial Patent Jurisdiction In Europe

W
WilmerHale

Contributor

WilmerHale provides legal representation across a comprehensive range of practice areas critical to the success of its clients. With a staunch commitment to public service, the firm is a leader in pro bono representation. WilmerHale is 1,000 lawyers strong with 12 offices in the United States, Europe and Asia.
US patents have some extraterritorial effect.
Worldwide Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal published this article written by Anthony Trenton, Trevor Cook, Justin Watts and Vanessa Wettner in its April 2019 issue. The article looks, in particular, at major European venues that have been asserting extraterritorial jurisdiction to varying degrees over the years, concluding that extraterritorial extension is already a feature of international patent litigation. It goes on to indicate that the opening of the Unified Patent Court will be a major shift as asserting extraterritorial jurisdiction will be its reason for being.

Excerpt: US patents have some extraterritorial effect. A party can be liable for patent infringement if it supplies components of a patented invention to a foreign country to be assembled there. In WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp., the US Supreme Court recently ruled, by a 7-2 majority, that damages can be recovered for lost profits in respect of foreign sales resulting from such supply.

The Assertion of Extraterritorial Patent Jurisdiction in Europe

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More