The debate surrounding the merits of the use of technology in sport is never far away. Last week FIFA announced that a decision as to whether professional football can use goal line technology will be made in March 2012 with a view to using it at the 2014 World Cup in Brazil. The Premier League commented that it would adopt such technology as soon as it is given approval by the governing body, possibly ready in time for the 2012/2013 season.
This amazing change in attitude at the top of FIFA has been brought about following increased calls for greater use of technology after several high profile goal line errors, notably Frank Lampard's goal that never was at the 2010 World Cup which lead to an apology from Sepp Blatter and a promise to reopen the debate about future technology use. FIFA's original argument that advancements in technology would both slow down the game and only be available at the top end of the industry now hold much less weight following the adoption of review systems in many of the top professional sports. Arsenal had hoped to pioneer goal line technology at their recent Emirates Cup pre-season tournament; however FIFA refused to allow this while a decision has yet to be formally announced.
How far can technology in sport go? And is advancement in technology good for sport? Not only does this question cover the controversial issue of video replays and goal line technology in football, cricket, tennis and rugby, but also the improvement of the equipment used from tennis rackets to swimming costumes. Would Bjorn Borg have gone on to even greater feats if he had the chance to use Rafael Nadal's racket of today; the AeroPro Drive GT with Graphite Tungsten Technology and the headsize covering 100 square inches? Arguably yes, but so would those who he competed against, therefore suggestions that technology in sport is making sport easier are short of the mark.
Technology in sport
While improvements in the material and quality of sporting equipment has undoubtedly helped modern day athletes reach even higher peaks, not all improvements have been regarded as a success. The Olympic motto: 'Citius Altius Fortius' (Faster, Higher, Stronger) can be seen as being achieved through technological advancements, however the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and other governing bodies have made clear that it will not allow all advancements at the expense of raw athletic ability. Obviously anti-doping regulations are in force to prevent performance enhancing drugs giving athletes a clear advantage over one another, and those who have been caught out by these drug tests have rightfully been shamed by their sport. However, greater understanding of dietary requirements and nutrition have greatly aided modern athletes to become fitter than their past equivalents.
The athletics governing body went further in originally not allowing Oscar Pistorious to compete in the "regular" athletics competitions due to the extra advantage gained through his prosthetic legs in conserving energy levels. Pistorious successfully challenged this approach in the Court of Arbitration and Lord Coe stated "He is eligible...and we will welcome him" after he achieved the required qualifying time for the 400m event at London 2012.
Swimming's governing body banned the use of performance-enhancing, non-textile swimsuits in January 2010 after 29 world records were set in 5 days at the World Championships in Rome in 2009. Not all advancements have proven beneficial to the world of sport. Adidas' Jubulani ball which was used at the 2010 world cup was widely criticised as having a detrimental effect on the game, despite being championed for its top of the range spherical appearance.
Video technology
Video technology and referral systems have become widely used in professional sports during the past twenty years. America in particular has embraced technology as a referral point on controversial issues such as boundary calls in major league baseball, buzzer beaters in Basketball and contentious decisions in American Football. Tennis has implemented the hawk-eye system, originally used as an aide for commentators which now allows players to make three challenges per set. Cricket too has adopted a similar system of challenges using the "third umpire". Cricket has yet to universally adopt all technology aides, such as Snicko, however India's recent endorsement of the review system, save for that against LBW decisions, could lead the way to further implementation. FIFA has long argued that football is too fast to interrupt with television replays. This argument has lost credibility as other high paced professional sports such as Rugby have the ability to refer and judge a decision in 30 seconds and the use of goal line technology is said to produce a decision almost instantaneously.
Fans and clubs alike have been increasing calls for FIFA to move with the times and follow other sports by adopting at least some method of review system. With the money involved in football, clubs argue, including notably last season Blackpool's Ian Holloway, that one bad call can lead to a missed promotion or relegation, and the financial pain that comes with that can be catastrophic to a club as a business.
Comment
Both video technology and technological advancement through engineering methods have both contributed greatly to the modern world of sport. While not universally accepted, video replays are becoming more and more widely used and are adding to the atmosphere and pantomime of sports such as cricket and tennis. Whether football will embrace this technology remains to be seen, although FIFA's latest announcement suggests that we are closer than ever to this at least. Advancements in other sporting equipment has helped modern athletes surpass records and achievements of athletic heroes of the past; however that should not take away the achievement from today's athletes. The sporting industry has clearly stated that performance enhancing drugs are not acceptable, but a healthy diet and nutrition is encouraged to increase individual performance. Sporting equipment will continue to improve and help players like Rafael Nadal achieve blistering pace and top-spin, until the next generation of top athletes and new technology come to surpass them.
The advancement in new technology is also good for business. Greater competition can lead to greater development of goods and ideas. Protection of the intellectual property of these ideas, designs and creations is essential to ensure that years of research and development result in a profit for the designer. Big sporting brands will be keen to associate themselves with products that are publicised and credited with an improvement in sport. The ICC has allowed companies the opportunity to sponsor the decision review system board which in turn leads to great publicity at the venue and on television. The money generated from such sponsorship is then reinvested in cricket boards that do not have the financial capability to implement their own technology system. This way, the sponsor of the new technology not only gains credit for being associated with the advancement in sporting technology, but also by adhering to their corporate and social responsibility by investing in sporting groups with less financial power.
The contents of this brochure are intended as guidelines for clients and other readers. It is not a substitute for considered advice on specific issues. Consequently, we cannot accept any responsibility for this information or for any errors or omissions.
Thomas Eggar LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC326278 whose registered office is at The Corn Exchange, Baffin's Lane, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1GE (VAT number 991259583). The word 'partner' refers to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of the members of the LLP is displayed at the above address, together with a list of those non-members who are designated as partners. Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Lexcel and Investors in People accredited.
Thomas Eggar LLP is not authorised by the Financial Services Authority. However, we are included on the register maintained by the Financial Services Authority so that we can carry on insurance mediation activity which is broadly the advising on, selling and administering of insurance contracts. This part of our business, including arrangements for complaints and redress if something goes wrong, is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The register can be accessed via the Financial Services Authority website. We can also provide certain further limited investment services to clients if those services are incidental to the professional services we have been engaged to provide as solicitors.
Thesis Asset Management plc, our associated financial services company, provides a comprehensive range of investment services and advice. Thesis is owned by members of Thomas Eggar LLP but is independent of and separate to it. No lawyer connected with Thomas Eggar LLP provides services through Thesis as a practicing lawyer regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Thesis is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Thesis has its own framework of investor protection and professional indemnity cover but Thesis clients do not enjoy the statutory protection of solicitors' clients.