The EPO Has Decided That Products Of Essentially Biological Processes Are To Be Excluded From Patentability

MC
Marks & Clerk

Contributor

Marks & Clerk is one of the UK’s foremost firms of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys. Our attorneys and solicitors are wired directly into the UK’s leading business and innovation economies. Alongside this we have offices in 9 international locations covering the EU, Canada and Asia, meaning we offer clients the best possible service locally, nationally and internationally.
The Administrative Council has therefore amended Rules 27 and 28 EPC to effect this change.
European Union Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The European Patent Office (EPO) has announced  that the Administrative Council has decided "to amend the relevant Regulations in order to exclude from patentability plants and animals exclusively obtained by an essentially biological breeding process". The Administrative Council has therefore amended Rules 27 and 28 EPC to effect this change. Most notably, Rule 28 has been amended to add an additional paragraph (2):

(2) Under Article 53(b), European patents shall not be granted in respect of plants or animals exclusively obtained by means of an essentially biological process.

This rule change came into force on 1 July 2017 and applies to all proceedings (whether examination or opposition) before the EPO.

As previously reported here, the European Commission adopted a Notice in November 2016 that stated that products of essentially biological processes should be excluded from patentability as that was the legislator's intention. This view was in contrast to previous EPO Enlarged Board of Appeal Decisions (reported here), which held that the exclusion under Article 53(b) to essentially biological processes should be interpreted narrowly and therefore not exclude products of essentially biological processes from patentability.The EPO stayed all examination and opposition proceedings relating to this subject matter in December 2016. This pause gave the EPO time to consider its position. The EPO has stated that following the decision, proceedings will now begin to resume gradually and be examined according to the new practice.

It appears that this change means that the previous "Broccoli" and "Tomatoes" cases would be decided differently today and that neither patent would be upheld; although this may depend on whether they were held to be "exclusively obtained" by means of an essentially biological process – an issue on which we can hope for further guidance in due course.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More