ARTICLE
23 February 2024

The UK Fails To Agree To A Voluntary Code Of Practice For Copyright And Gen AI

KG
K&L Gates

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
n initiative to create a voluntary code of practice on copyright and Generative AI ("Gen AI") has failed to reach an agreement. The UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO)...
UK Technology
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

An initiative to create a voluntary code of practice on copyright and Generative AI ("Gen AI") has failed to reach an agreement. The UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO), who led the conversations that started mid-2023, has not been able to reach consensus within the working group in relation to the use of copyright protected works to train Gen AI models. The announcement is a disappointment to many including the creative industry, who were awaiting clarification on their position in protecting their works and retrieving compensation, and technology industry who were seeking clarity how future technologies can be developed.

The creative industry expressed their concern regarding the protection of copyright content in the era of generative AI. In particular, their concern addressed the large-scale use of works to train Gen AI models and the consequences this has on the ability of right holders to retain autonomy and control over copyright work. In contrast, developers of AI have emphasised access to a wide-range of datasets is needed to further develop and train AI systems, and they have sought legal clarity that they can do so.

The UKIPO had brought together stakeholders of the creative industry and AI technology companies in order to create a voluntary code of practice to provide more clarity and guidance on the use of and compensation for copyright content in AI. The UK Government shared in its statement that the initiative served as a valuable mechanism for parties to share their views. However, the parties involved have not been able to reach an agreement on an effective voluntary code of practice.

This news shows the difficult position of the UK government in allowing and encouraging further innovation of AI technologies and simultaneously trying to address key concerns associated with the rapid growth of AI, including the protection of copyright.

The UK Government has said that it will now lead further engagement with the right holders and AI sectors to find an effective approach to grow into partnership together. The UK Government has stressed that they seek an outcome that ensures that AI technologies provide support to the creative industry, rather than frustrate human creativity and innovation. Part of this work will involve to seek trust and transparency between the parties, and for rights holders to better understand whether the work they create is used for AI training purposes. The Government has promised to provide a more detailed proposal on this soon.

This announcement has come around the same time as the launch of a consultation series initiated by the UK Information Commissioners Office on how requirements under UK Data Protection Laws should apply to the development and use of Gen AI. Read more about this consultation on our blog.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More