Landlords - Don't Be Shy, Give Your Address!

In a decision handed down on 8 May 2012 the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) have clarified a long standing requirement that a demand for rent or service charges must contain the name and address of the landlord, if it is to be regarded as a valid demand.
UK Real Estate and Construction
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a decision handed down on 8 May 2012 the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) have clarified a long standing requirement that a demand for rent or service charges must contain the name and address of the landlord, if it is to be regarded as a valid demand.

Nowhere to hide

The requirement has been in place since the commencement of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, but it has become common practice for some landlords to insert the address of its managing agents or a 'care of' address on demands. This is particularly so where the address of the landlord is outside of the UK. The Case of Beitov Properties Limited V Elliston Bentley Martin has determined that a demand must state the full name and address of the landlord, even if the address is a registered office which might be at a solicitors office or accountants', or outside of the UK.

Health check required

The decision confirms that the purpose of Section 47 (1)(a) is to enable the lessees to know who their landlords are. If the landlords address is outside of England and Wales, it is a further requirement under Section 47(1)(b) that an address in England and Wales at which notices can be served must also be provided on any demand. This can be utilised to state the address of any managing agent. Prudent landlords should check that their service charge demands comply with this basic requirement.

Unforseen consequences

The risk of not complying is that the sums being claimed in a demand which does not comply are not regarded as being due. In the Beitov case this meant that a case brought for recovery of service charges failed on a mere technicality, a point considered by the President of the Upper Tribunal; "No purpose will in the circumstances have been served in imposing on the landlord the need to deal with the issue raised, to serve a fresh demand and, quite possibly, to take further proceedings for recovery".

Thomas Eggar LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales under registered number OC326278 whose registered office is at The Corn Exchange, Baffin's Lane, Chichester, West Sussex, PO19 1GE (VAT number 991259583). The word 'partner' refers to a member of the LLP, or an employee or consultant with equivalent standing and qualifications. A list of the members of the LLP is displayed at the above address, together with a list of those non-members who are designated as partners. Regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Lexcel and Investors in People accredited.

Thomas Eggar LLP is not authorised by the Financial Services Authority. However, we are included on the register maintained by the Financial Services Authority so that we can carry on insurance mediation activity which is broadly the advising on, selling and administering of insurance contracts. This part of our business, including arrangements for complaints and redress if something goes wrong, is regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. The register can be accessed via the Financial Services Authority website. We can also provide certain further limited investment services to clients if those services are incidental to the professional services we have been engaged to provide as solicitors.

Thesis Asset Management plc, our associated financial services company, provides a comprehensive range of investment services and advice. Thesis is owned by members of Thomas Eggar LLP but is independent of and separate to it. No lawyer connected with Thomas Eggar LLP provides services through Thesis as a practicing lawyer regulated by the Solicitors Regulation Authority. Thesis is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. Thesis has its own framework of investor protection and professional indemnity cover but Thesis clients do not enjoy the statutory protection of solicitors' clients.

The contents of this article are intended as guidelines for clients and other readers. It is not a substitute for considered advice on specific issues. Consequently, we cannot accept any responsibility for this information or for any errors or omissions.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More