ARTICLE
9 August 2019

Accommodation Claims: Roberts v Johnstone Challenge To Be Handled As Test Case

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
The Court of Appeal has adjourned the appeal hearing of Swift v Carpenter to allow the parties to file additional expert evidence.
UK Insurance
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Court of Appeal has adjourned the appeal hearing of Swift v Carpenter to allow the parties to file additional expert evidence. The Personal Injury Bar Association was also granted permission to intervene as an interested party.

Further directions have been made granting all parties permission to obtain expert evidence and to lodge further written submissions. Indications are that the appeal hearing will be heard in early 2020.

First instance

Since the decision in Roberts v Johnstone [1989] Q.B. 878, the cost of future accommodation has been calculated on the basis of compensation for the loss of use of capital used to purchase a more expensive property.

Whilst the claimant retains an appreciating asset in the property, the capital tied up would not have produced any return of investment and so a claimant is compensated for this loss. Until 2017, these calculations involved a positive discount rate.

At first instance, the Claimant argued that where there was a negative discount rate, the calculation of accommodation claims using Roberts v Johnstone would result in no loss, and that this was unfair.

Nonetheless, the High Court reaffirmed Roberts v Johnstone, finding that whilst it is not flawless, it remained good law and should continue to form the basis upon which future accommodation claims are calculated.

Appeal

The Court of Appeal judges have made clear that this appeal should be considered a test case allowing a "fuller review of all possible alternatives" for calculating accommodation claims, which by extension will determine whether Roberts v Johnstone remains the most appropriate methodology.

The decision to allow further expert evidence and designate this matter a test case will be of great interest to both claimants and defendants, particularly in light of the recent change to the discount rate, which retained a negative figure of -0.25%

We will continue to keep track of the progression of this appeal, and will report further.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More