ARTICLE
26 September 2023

UK's FCA Challenges Firms To Improve Sanction Screening Processes

KG
K&L Gates

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
The FCA has assessed and reported on the sanctions controls of over 90 financial service firms from a range of sectors including wealth management.
UK International Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The FCA has assessed and reported on the sanctions controls of over 90 financial service firms from a range of sectors including wealth management.

What are firms doing well?

  • Horizon scanning and scenario planning, sample testing, tuning of screening tools and screening tools with built-in fuzzy logic were praised by the FCA.

What needs improvement?

  1. Management Information: Some firms were not providing senior managers with sufficient information on sanctions processes.
  2. Resources: Lack of internal resources and expertise in firms' sanctions teams has led to unacceptable screening backlogs.
  3. Screening:
    • Improperly calibrated tools which were either too sensitive or not sensitive enough.
    • Screening tools taking too long to update their lists following a designation.
    • Over-reliance on unchecked third-party screening tools.
  4. CDD and KYC: Low quality CDD and KYC leading firms to not screen all relevant parties because the full ownership structure of an entity was not identified.
  5. Breach Reporting: Taking weeks or months or entirely neglecting, to report sanctions breaches to the FCA.

What do firms need to do?

  1. Ensure appropriate KYC and CDD is completed for all potential parties, including their controllers, shareholders and Ultimate Beneficial Owners.
  2. Review current reporting procedures for potential sanctions breaches and ensure that all relevant staff are appropriately trained to meet their obligations under the relevant sanctions regimes.
  3. Continue to enhance their screening tools and regularly test their efficacy.
  4. Ensure information provided to senior managers on sanctions processes is sufficiently detailed.
  5. Check there is sufficient oversight to ascertain the efficacy of any third-party screening tools in use.
  6. Understand that the financial and reputational risks from sanctions breaches are growing as the OFSI increases its enforcement activity.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More