Zero Hours Contracts – The Ban On Exclusivity Clauses

WB
Wedlake Bell

Contributor

We are a contemporary London law firm, rooted in tradition with a lasting legacy of client service. Founded in 1780, we recognise the long-standing relationships we have with our clients and how they have helped shape our past and provide a platform for our future. With 76 partners supported by over 300 lawyers and support staff, we operate on a four practice group model: private client, business services, real estate and dispute resolution. Our driving force is to empower our clients by providing quality legal advice, insight and intelligence that enables them to achieve their goals whether personal or business. We are large enough to advise on the most complex matters, but small enough to ensure that our people and our work remain exceptional and dynamic. Building relationships is at the heart of everything we do.
Employers are now prevented from prohibiting a worker on a zero-hours contract from also working elsewhere. This change was brought into force on 26th May 2015.
UK Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Employers are now prevented from prohibiting a worker on a zero-hours contract from also working elsewhere. This change was brought into force on 26th May 2015

A zero-hours contract is a contract whereby an employer does not guarantee to provide a worker with any work, and only pays a worker for work actually done.   Historically, some of these types of contract also contained an 'exclusivity' clause.   The new law will make exclusivity clauses in zero-hours contracts unenforceable, but will not render the entire contract unenforceable (so you don't have to rip up the contract and start again).

This is unlikely to be the end of the regulation of zero-hours contracts. The ban does not prevent employers from guaranteeing only a couple of hours' work per week or penalising workers who have jobs elsewhere, ie. offering those workers less work.  Following a consultation earlier this year, the Government said it would introduce new anti-avoidance regulations to protect zero hours workers from being disadvantaged by working under more than one contract. The Government has also discussed banning exclusivity clauses in all contracts of employment where the worker is not guaranteed a certain level of weekly income.  However, there is no indication as yet as to when the Government might finalise these anti-avoidance regulations and bring them into force.

The press commentary on zero-hours contracts has focused predominantly on lower paid workers. However, the new law may also impact higher paid workers who use these types of arrangements. For example, an employer who uses a highly paid consultant who has a zero-hours contract arrangement may not be able to rely on some non-compete provisions in the contract, such as the consultant working for another competitor employer.  This may have more of a significant impact, and perhaps was not fully intended when trying to protect those in lower paid positions.

Given the risk that non-compete clauses, in particular for senior individuals, will not be enforceable under such zero-hours contracts, it would be advisable to consider whether this type of contract is still suitable for your business.  This will be all the more important if the Government introduces further protection for zero-hours workers.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More