ARTICLE
25 April 2018

How Does An Employer Know Whether An Employee Is Disabled?

BD
Brahams Dutt Badrick French LLP

Contributor

Brahams Dutt Badrick French LLP logo
BDBF is a leading firm of specialist employment lawyers based in the City of London. Collectively, our reputed lawyers possess decades of real-world experience in resolving the toughest workplace disputes at the most senior level. We represent:
  • Senior executive employees
  • Partners
  • Small business owners
  • Limited liability partnerships
Contact +44(0)203 0350 or info@bdbf.co.uk for how we can help you.
The Court of Appeal has decided that the test was not whether the employer did all it could to determine whether an employee was disabled and exhaust every option open to them ...
UK Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Court of Appeal has decided that the test was not whether the employer did all it could to determine whether an employee was disabled and exhaust every option open to them; rather, it was whether the employer could be reasonably expected to know the employee was disabled.

The facts of this case are not unusual.

Ms Donelien was a court officer employed by Liberata for almost 11 years. Her employment featured numerous of short-term sickness absences for which various explanations were given (including, on one occasion, no explanation) and often no advance notice of her absence was given. Liberata referred Ms Donelien to Occupational Health in May 2009, posing a number of questions as it did so.

In July 2009, OH reported that Ms Donelien was not disabled; however, the report failed to engage with a number of the questions posed. Liberata followed up by requesting a second OH report. Whilst the second report was more detailed (and again stated that Ms Donelien was not disabled), it still failed to answer some questions.. Liberata did not go back to OH a third time, but instead held 'return-to-work' interviews with Ms Donelien and reviewed correspondence from her GP.

Liberata dismissed Ms Donelien in October 2009 on the basis of unsatisfactory attendance, a failure to comply with absence notification procedures and a failure to work contractual hours. In response, Ms Donelien brought a number of claims in the Employment Tribunal including a failure to make reasonable adjustments.

The Employment Tribunal found that Ms Donelien was disabled from August 2009. The question was whether Liberata had constructive knowledge of that disability.

This case confirms that employers are allowed to place weight on the reports provided by OH, so long as they exercise their own independent judgment and avoid blindly relying on them.

Donelien v Liberata UK Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 129

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More