ARTICLE
16 December 2014

Northhampton County Court Discovers A Loophole In Part 36

CC
Clyde & Co

Contributor

Clyde & Co  logo
Clyde & Co is a leading, sector-focused global law firm with 415 partners, 2200 legal professionals and 3800 staff in over 50 offices and associated offices on six continents. The firm specialises in the sectors that move, build and power our connected world and the insurance that underpins it, namely: transport, infrastructure, energy, trade & commodities and insurance. With a strong focus on developed and emerging markets, the firm is one of the fastest growing law firms in the world with ambitious plans for further growth.
In this case, Northhampton County Court felt bound to decide that the original acceptance period for a Part 36 offer had expired and was not renewed upon the offer being varied.
UK Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Burrett v Mencap Ltd

In this case, Northhampton County Court felt bound to decide that the original acceptance period for a Part 36 offer had expired and was not renewed upon the offer being varied. This decision is surprising, but does appear to be in accordance with the strict letter of Part 36 of the Civil Procedure Rules. In light of this ruling, offerors may wish to consider varying their offers rather than making completely new offers since the latter will trigger a new period for acceptance to run.

A settlement offer in the correct form was served on the claimant, Burrett by the defendant, Mencap, on 19 July 2013, where it lay on the table, neither unaccepted nor withdrawn. On 17 January 2014, Mencap served on Burrett a variation to change the terms of the July 2013 offer. Burrett accepted the varied offer. The issue was whether, in relation to the varied Part 36 offer, the time for acceptance remains 21 days from the date of the original offer or whether a fresh 21 day period of time begins to run from the date of the varied offer. If the latter, the claimant, Burrett would have the benefit of rule 36.2(2)(c) which provides that the offer should specify a period of "not less than 21 days within which the Defendant will be liable for the Claimant's costs in accordance with rule 36.10 if the offer is accepted".

The Northampton County Court reflected upon whether the varied offer should be able to carry with it the costs protection that attached to the original offer. In this case, six months had passed between the original offer and the varied offer. It noted that CPR Part 36 does not provide any guidance about extension or renewal of the time for acceptance of varied Part 36 offers. Nor does it set out whether the offeree should have any time to contemplate the terms of the varied offer. In light of that, the Court was forced to find that there is no implied entitlement to the original period for acceptance being renewed or extended upon the offer being varied. The Court concluded that the time that was given in the original offer was the applicable relevant period for acceptance.

http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/Misc/2014/B50.html

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More