ARTICLE
2 December 2013

ASA Sets New Standards For Non-Broadcast Advertising

RS
Reed Smith (Worldwide)

Contributor

Reed Smith (Worldwide) logo
Reed Smith is a dynamic international law firm helping clients move their businesses forward. By delivering smart, creative legal services, we enrich clients' experiences with us and support achievement of their business goals. Our longstanding relationships and collaborative structure enable the speedy resolution of complex disputes, transactions, and regulatory matters.
Industry
United Kingdom Media, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Last week the ASA announced that it has struck a new deal with Trading Standards to enable the membership association to act as a legal backstop to take action against brands who persistently breach the CAP code through "misleading, aggressive or otherwise unfair" non-broadcast ads. Trading standards can consider taking action against advertisers referred by the ASA, under consumer and business protection laws.

The ASA has in the past referred non-broadcast advertisers to the OFT for formal sanctions and has a similar relationship with Ofcom with respect to broadcast advertising.

ASA chief executive, Guy Parker, said: "We already enjoy a close and effective working relationship with Trading Standards. This new arrangement will help us become more joined-up and consistent as well as giving consumers and business confidence that an advertiser who doesn't play by the rules will face the consequences."

Although the specifics of how the referral process will work in practice are unclear, advertisers which have in the past considered the ASA to have no 'bite' should take heed of this new development.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More