The Airline Insolvency Bill - The Slow Path To Reform

RS
Reed Smith (Worldwide)

Contributor

Reed Smith (Worldwide) logo
Reed Smith is a dynamic international law firm helping clients move their businesses forward. By delivering smart, creative legal services, we enrich clients' experiences with us and support achievement of their business goals. Our longstanding relationships and collaborative structure enable the speedy resolution of complex disputes, transactions, and regulatory matters.
The UK Government recently responded to The House of Commons Transport Committee's Report, titled "UK aviation: reform for take-off". The Report makes a number of recommendations...
UK Transport
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The UK Government recently responded to The House of Commons Transport Committee's Report, titled "UK aviation: reform for take-off". The Report makes a number of recommendations to address ongoing problems facing the UK aviation sector as it moves towards post-pandemic recovery. Alongside other issues, it raises the idea of reform to the airline insolvency procedure and passenger protections to be addressed by way of an Airline Insolvency Bill. This was previously discussed in 2019 in the independent Airline Insolvency Review's Final Report, which was commissioned in an attempt to avoid a repeat of the expensive repatriation exercises arising from the failures of Monarch Airlines and Thomas Cook – see our previous commentary on the 2019 Report. The suggestions from the 2019 Report were largely put on hold during the pandemic as a result of the uncertainty and economic hardship caused by restrictions on international air travel.

The government's response indicates that an Airline Insolvency Bill is still being considered. The 2022 Report referred to examples in other countries which allow airlines to continue to operate while insolvent, such as use of Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the U.S., which allows failed businesses to remain in possession of their assets and borrow money with court approval; such insolvency tools would allow collapsed airlines to use their own aircrafts to repatriate passengers and avoid the costs of repatriation falling on the taxpayer. The Government's response indicates that it partially accepts the recommendations for an Airline Insolvency Bill to be introduced in the next Session of Parliament, however it maintains that any solution must be fit for today's aviation landscape and should balance the interests of consumers, taxpayers and other stakeholders. If a Bill is required, the Government promises to introduce this as soon as practicable.

Alongside recommendations for airline insolvency reform, the Report offers additional recommendations to accelerate market recovery and reforms to the ATOL scheme. The Government's response highlights the publication of "Flightpath to the Future", which it describes as a strategic framework for the future of aviation and includes the prospect of an Aviation Passenger Charter which sets out the rights and responsibilities of passengers in one place. The Government is also working with the aviation regulator, the Civil Aviation Authority in developing proposals to reform the ATOL scheme, which we expect to be published later this year. It is possible that these recent publications will lead to legislative reform with a significant impact for the aviation sector. As such, airlines, travel operators and passengers should stay abreast of any changes to their rights and responsibilities.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More