An Important Decision From The Council Of State Regarding The Time Limits For Filing A Lawsuit: Even If The Administrative Acts Are Subject To A Special Time Limit, The General Time Limit Will Be Applied To The Written Notices If No Time Limit Is Indicated

EA
Esin Attorney Partnership

Contributor

Esin Attorney Partnership, a member firm of Baker & McKenzie International, has long been a leading provider of legal services in the Turkish market. We have a total of nearly 140 staff, including over 90 lawyers, serving some of the largest Turkish and multinational corporations. Our clients benefit from on-the-ground assistance that reflects a deep understanding of the country's legal, regulatory and commercial practices, while also having access to the full-service, international and foreign law advice of the world's leading global law firm. We help our clients capture and optimize opportunities in Turkey's dynamic market, including the key growth areas of mergers and acquisitions, infrastructure development, private equity and real estate. In addition, we are one of the few firms that can offer services in areas such as compliance, tax, employment, and competition law — vital for companies doing business in Turkey.
The Council of State's ("Council") Board of the Unification of Case Laws' decision No. 2022/1 ("Decision") was published in the Official Gazette on 19 June 2022.
Turkey Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Recent developments

The Council of State's ("Council") Board of the Unification of Case Laws' decision No. 2022/1 ("Decision") was published in the Official Gazette on 19 June 2022. According to the Decision, if the general or special time limit for filing a lawsuit is not indicated in the written notice regarding the administrative act, regardless of whether it is subject to a special time limit, the general time limit for filing a lawsuit under the Code of Administrative Procedure will be applied.

Developments introduced

First, the Council separated the administrative acts that were notified in writing but did not specify the time limit for filing a lawsuit and the administrative acts that were implicitly rejected by the administration. The Council decided that there is no need to unify the case laws on the administrative acts rejected implicitly, as there is no difference between the chamber's decisions. However, it decided that unification is required for the administrative acts notified in writing.

Prior to the Decision, there were different approaches as to the time limit to be applied for the administrative acts that were notified in writing but the notices of which did not specify the applicable time limit for filing the lawsuit. The first approach suggested that the special time limits for the acts that fall under them should apply. The second approach suggested that the general time limits should apply to both the acts that are subject to the general time limits and the special time limits. Finally, the third approach suggested that in such case no time limit should apply.

The Council examined the approaches to the topic and decided that, if the time limit was not indicated in the written notice, the general time limit for filing a lawsuit should apply even if the administrative act is subject to a special time limit. The Council also underlined that in the event of a conflict of interest, there should be a delicate balance between legal securities, administrative stability, the right to court access and the time limit for filing a case related to public order.

Conclusion

With the Decision, in cases where the time limit for filing a lawsuit is not notified in the written notice regarding an administrative act, then the general time limit for filing a lawsuit will apply regardless of whether the administrative act is subject to a special time limit. As per the Code of Administrative Procedure, the general time limit for filing a lawsuit is 30 days before the tax courts and 60 days before the Council and administrative courts.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More