A Milestone In Dispute Resolution: UN Adopts Code Of Conduct For Investment Dispute Arbitrators

C
CBC Law Firm

Contributor

CBC Law (Formerly Cetinkaya) is a full-service law firm based in Istanbul servicing local and international clients. Our lawyers have extensive expertise in advising on dispute resolution, business crime, technology, data protection and intellectual property. CBC Law prides itself on helping clients navigate their way through a constantly changing and challenging legal landscape. With a seamless multidisciplinary approach positioned at the intersection of industry knowledge and legal expertise, we provide our clients with legal solutions that are tailored to their needs in Turkey.
During its 56th annual session in Vienna, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law ("UNCITRAL") achieved a long-awaited milestone by formally adopting the Code of Conduct...
Turkey Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

During its 56th annual session in Vienna, the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law ("UNCITRAL") achieved a long-awaited milestone by formally adopting the Code of Conduct for Arbitrators in International Investment Disputes (the "Code"), marking a significant step forward in the realm of investment dispute resolution.

Algeria proposed the Code's inception in 2015, and since UNCITRAL's endorsement, it has been under development since 2017. Collaboratively, the Secretariats of UNCITRAL and the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes ("ICSID") have worked on the Code throughout the period. Drawing from an extensive review of standards found in codes of conduct in investment treaties and arbitration rules applicable to Investor-State Dispute Settlement ("ISDS") and international courts, the Code aims to set new benchmarks for arbitration ethics and conduct.

ICSID announced that the final draft of the Code will be published after the conclusion of UNCITRAL's 56th annual session on July 21, 2023.

Highlights of the Code

  • Independence and Impartiality: The Code reinforces the duty of arbitrators to maintain independence and impartiality. To address concerns of potential bias, it strictly regulates "double-hatting," disallowing arbitrators from acting as legal representatives or expert witnesses in any ISDS case or related proceeding involving the same matter for a specified period. The issue of double-hatting has been a subject of debate, with critics arguing it undermines the neutrality of arbitrators, while defenders contend that counsel experience provides a broader perspective. However, the Code strives to strike a balance between these viewpoints.
  • Tribunal Assistants and Unethical Behaviour: The Code sets out guidelines on the role and duties of tribunal assistants while also outlining sanctions for unethical conduct by arbitrators. These measures aim to enhance the integrity and fairness of the arbitration process.
  • Confidentiality, Caseload, and Reasonable Fees: The Code establishes obligations related to maintaining the confidentiality of proceedings and sets limits on the number of cases that arbitrators can simultaneously handle to ensure effective case management. Additionally, it provides guidelines on reasonable fees and expenses to maintain transparency and fairness.
  • Applicability: The Code will apply to arbitration proceedings by mutual consent of the parties or as required in the instrument of consent to arbitral proceedings. ICSID intends to engage in further consultations with its member states to explore the potential application of the Code in ICSID proceedings.

In addition to adopting the Code, UNCITRAL also embraced guidelines governing the utilization of mediation in investor-state dispute settlement, with specific reference to ICSID's rules for investor-state mediation.

Ultimately, the adoption of the Code signifies a significant advancement in the ongoing efforts to reform Investor-State Dispute Settlement, exemplifying a transparent and comprehensive process that promotes equity, efficiency, and credibility in resolving international investment disputes.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More