ARTICLE
2 November 2009

No Stamp Duty On Shareholder Loans

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

Companies have good grounds for claiming reimbursement of any stamp duty they paid on loans received from shareholders in 2007-2008.
Poland Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Companies have good grounds for claiming reimbursement of any stamp duty they paid on loans received from shareholders in 2007-2008.

This follows a ruling by the District Administrative Court in Warsaw that loans to capital companies by shareholders should not be subject to stamp duty as this contravened EU law.

Stamp duty is an indirect tax on raising capital in Poland. When Poland joined the EU, loans from shareholders to capital companies were exempted from stamp duty; but the exemption was removed in 2007-2008.

The court ruled that EU regulations were aimed at eliminating stamp duty to support the free movement of capital within the EU. It pointed out that instability in Poland's laws on this issue was damaging to the economy.

Law: Verdict of the District Administrative Court in Warsaw dated 11 September 2009 (III SA/Wa 619/09)

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 29/10/2009.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More