Navigating Materiality Key Insights From IFRS S1 And S2

KPMG

Contributor

In the evolving landscape of corporate reporting, materiality has emerged as a cornerstone concept, particularly within the framework of the International Financial Reporting Standards Sustainability Disclosure Standards. IFRS S1 and S2 are pivotal standards that guide companies in disclosing sustainability-related financial information.
Saudi Arabia Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In the evolving landscape of corporate reporting, materiality has emerged as a cornerstone concept, particularly within the framework of the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Sustainability Disclosure Standards. IFRS S1 and S2 are pivotal standards that guide companies in disclosing sustainability-related financial information. Understanding and effectively applying materiality in this context ensures that stakeholders receive relevant and reliable information, fostering transparency and accountability.

How materiality is defined under IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards

Under IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards, materiality is defined with a specific focus on the potential impact of sustainability-related risks and opportunities on a company's enterprise value. The IFRS standards emphasize a dual-materiality perspective, which considers:

  1. Impact on enterprise value: This involves assessing how sustainability issues can affect a company's financial performance, position, and cash flows. For instance, climate-related risks such as regulatory changes or physical impacts from climate change can materially influence a company's profitability and valuation.
  2. Impact on stakeholders: This broader perspective considers the significance of sustainability issues to a wide range of stakeholders, including employees, customers, and communities. It considers how a company's sustainability practices and disclosures can influence stakeholder perceptions and behaviors.

How materiality under IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards is different

The definition and application of materiality under IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards differ from those under other existing sustainability frameworks and standards in several ways:

  1. Dual-materiality perspective: Unlike some frameworks that may focus solely on the financial impact of sustainability issues, the IFRS approach incorporates a dual-materiality perspective. This means it considers both the impact on enterprise value and the broader impact on stakeholders. This dual approach ensures a more comprehensive assessment of materiality, addressing both financial and non-financial considerations.
  2. Investor-centric focus: The IFRS standards prioritize the information needs of primary users, particularly investors, lenders, and other creditors. While other frameworks, such as the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), may place equal emphasis on a wider array of stakeholders, including communities and employees, the IFRS standards are specifically designed to meet the decision-making needs of financial stakeholders.
  3. Integration with financial reporting: IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards are designed to be integrated with financial reporting, providing a cohesive and unified approach to corporate reporting. This integration ensures that sustainability-related financial disclosures are aligned with traditional financial statements, offering a holistic view of the company's performance and risks.
  4. Specificity and guidance: IFRS S1 and S2 provide specific guidelines and requirements for reporting sustainability-related financial information. This contrasts with some other frameworks, which may offer more general principles and less prescriptive guidance. The specificity of the IFRS standards helps ensure consistency and comparability across companies and industries.
  5. Emphasis on future-oriented information: The IFRS standards place significant emphasis on forward-looking information, requiring companies to disclose how they are addressing potential future risks and opportunities related to sustainability. This proactive approach differs from some frameworks that may focus more on historical and current performance.

How materiality is applied differently under IFRS S1 and S2

While IFRS S1 and S2 both emphasize materiality, they apply the concept differently based on their specific focus areas:

IFRS S1 – general requirements for sustainability-related disclosures:

Materiality under IFRS S1 is applied to ensure that all relevant sustainability information is presented in a manner that aligns with and complements the financial statements, providing a comprehensive view of the company's performance and risks.

IFRS S2 – climate-related disclosures:

Under IFRS S2, materiality is applied to ensure that companies provide detailed information on climate-related metrics, targets, and strategies. This includes disclosures on greenhouse gas emissions, climate risk assessments, and the financial impacts of climate change mitigation and adaptation measures.

IFRS S2 also encourages the use of scenario analysis to evaluate the potential future impacts of climate change on the company. Materiality in this context involves assessing the significance of various climate scenarios and their implications for the company's strategy and financial performance.

What is the impact?

The impact of effectively applying materiality under IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards is multifaceted:

  1. Enhanced stakeholder trust: Transparent and reliable sustainability disclosures build trust among stakeholders. Investors, in particular, gain confidence in the company's ability to manage sustainability-related risks and opportunities, which can positively influence investment decisions.
  2. Improved risk management: By identifying and disclosing material sustainability issues, companies are better equipped to manage risks that could affect their long-term viability.
  3. Competitive advantage: Companies that excel in sustainability reporting can differentiate themselves from their peers. Demonstrating a commitment to sustainability can enhance a company's reputation and attractiveness to customers, employees, and investors.

Actions for management

To effectively implement materiality in sustainability disclosures, management should consider the following actions:

  1. Establish a materiality assessment framework: Develop a robust framework for assessing materiality that incorporates both financial and stakeholder impact perspectives. This framework should be periodically reviewed and updated to reflect emerging sustainability issues and stakeholder expectations.
  2. Integrate sustainability into corporate strategy: Ensure that sustainability considerations are embedded into the company's overall strategy and decision-making processes. This integration will facilitate the identification and management of material sustainability issues.
  3. Invest in data management and reporting systems: Implement advanced data management and reporting systems to enhance the accuracy and reliability of sustainability disclosures. Utilize technology to streamline data collection, analysis, and reporting processes.
  4. Provide training and resources: Equip management and employees with the necessary knowledge and resources to understand and apply materiality in sustainability reporting. This includes training on the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards and best practices for sustainability reporting.

Last word

Materiality is a critical concept in the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards, guiding companies in providing relevant and decision-useful sustainability information. By effectively identifying, managing, and reporting material sustainability issues, companies can enhance their transparency and accountability, ultimately supporting better decision-making by stakeholders. The evolving nature of sustainability challenges underscores the need for a dynamic and proactive approach to materiality in corporate reporting.

This article was supported by Zacharias Malik, Assistant Manager, ESG Services.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More