PRESS RELEASE
19 May 2026

Mayland Discusses Impact Of Fiduciary Rule Rollbacks On 401(k) Plan Advisors

GL
Groom Law Group

Contributor

Groom Law is the nation’s preeminent benefits, retirement, and health care law firm. We built our success over decades of solving complex ERISA/employee benefits challenges in the public and private sectors, providing innovative legal solutions, value, and true partnership to our clients every step of the way.
Financial advisers and insurance agents may finally have some regulatory certainty on the question of when giving advice on a 401(k) plan qualifies someone as a fiduciary...
United States

Financial advisers and insurance agents may finally have some regulatory certainty on the question of when giving advice on a 401(k) plan qualifies someone as a fiduciary following a series of court rulings and Department of Labor actions rolling back recent fiduciary rule expansions, according to this Bloomberg Law article "401(k) Advisers See Clarity for Now in Fiduciary Rule Rollbacks." The article examines the retirement industry's reaction to the DOL's decision to restore the 1975 five-part fiduciary test and the Deseret opinion.

As explained by Groom principal Scott Mayland, "The results of the core decisions is that for financial institutions that want to be in the situation that they were before all this, they can be." He clarified "the goal of the litigation really [was] to restore the five-part test and also the Deseret opinion."

To read the full feature, click here.

Contributor

Groom Law is the nation’s preeminent benefits, retirement, and health care law firm. We built our success over decades of solving complex ERISA/employee benefits challenges in the public and private sectors, providing innovative legal solutions, value, and true partnership to our clients every step of the way.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More