EQC Action Group Settlement - landslide victory or confirming the status quo?

CL
Cavell Leitch

Contributor

It’s our mission to deliver New Zealand’s best legal experience. This isn’t just about our expertise but about the way we deliver it. We understand that legal matters can be confusing, stressful and scary so we try our hardest to simplify the process, listen to your needs and deliver timely, transparent advice.
The joint statement sets out principles that EQC is obliged to follow in dealing with over claims for earthquake damage.
New Zealand Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Litigation

Whilst the home owners have announced that the outcome is a landslide victory, the EQC maintains that the outcome simply reiterates principles that they already apply. We think that some of our clients will raise their eyebrows at this!

A joint statement has been released as part of the settlement which sets out principles that EQC is obliged to follow in dealing with claims for cover for earthquake damage. In summary the joint statement confirms:

  1. EQC is obliged to fix earthquake damage to an 'as new' state, and in accordance with current rules and legislation. The terms 'like for like' or 'pre-earthquake state' are acknowledged as not being the appropriate standard.
  2. EQC cannot decline to cover releveling of an earthquake damaged floor simply because the MBIE Guidelines might suggest that the floor is within an acceptable tolerance level.
  3. If undamaged areas of the house (such as wiring) are affected or compromised in the course of the earthquake damage repair works then EQC must also cover the additional cost of work on those undamaged parts.
  4. Cash settlements are to be calculated by virtue of the same test as is mentioned above (not 'like for like' or 'pre-earthquake state').

The statement does provide direction and authority which will assist and reassure home owners about their EQC cover entitlements. Although EQC does not admit wrongdoing, EQC may need to revise its public information guides such as the "Customer Guide to the Canterbury Home Repair Programme", which refers to EQC repairing a home to its 'pre-earthquake state'.

We anticipate that this joint statement will prompt many Christchurch homeowners to reassess and reconsider their own settlements or EQC repairs. Whilst each case will turn on its particular facts, if EQC has applied an incorrect standard to cash settle repairs or undertake repair works, the homeowner may have an entitlement to additional value or relief.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More