ARTICLE
30 March 2020

A Recent Update From The Financial Services And Pensions Ombudsman

RL
RDJ LLP

Contributor

At RDJ, we combine legal insight and human intelligence to deliver long-lasting business impact. As one of Ireland’s leading corporate law firms, we’re as ambitious for your business as you are. With offices in Cork, Dublin, Galway and London, we represent clients from scaling and established Irish companies to multinationals, financial institutions and global insurance companies with unique cross-sectoral expertise. We build meaningful relationships with clients and counsel to deliver tangible value for more sustainable businesses, becoming our client’s most trusted advisors and the number one employer of choice for legal talent in Ireland. And, by investing in the progress of our people and harnessing new technologies, we power agile decision-making that adds long-term value every step of the way. Legal Insights. Human Intelligence. Business Impact
On 13 February 2020, the Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman (the "FSPO") published a digest of legally binding decisions issued in 2019
Ireland Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 13 February 2020, the Financial Services and Pensions Ombudsman (the “FSPO”) published a digest of legally binding decisions issued in 2019 (https://www.fspo.ie/Digest_of_Decisions) together with an accompanying Press Release.  The digest includes a short summary of a selection of 33 decisions in relation to complaints made against financial service providers.  The FSPO has also created an on-line database of legally binding decisions, which can be accessed at www.fspo.ie/decisions/database

The FSPO digest informs us that the FSPO issued 439 legally binding decisions in 2019, 394 of which were published in conjunction with the latest volume of the digest of decisions.  The FSPO digest states that it resolved the majority of complaints in 2019 through mediation; approximately 2,160. 

The 439 legally binding decisions issued in 2019 is almost double the number of decisions issued in 2018.   The FSPO states that in the case of 201 decisions, the complaint was upheld to some extent while 238 decisions were not upheld.  We are informed that a total of six of all 673 FSPO decisions issued to date have been appealed by the parties to the High Court.  Of the 439 decisions issued in 2019, five were appealed to the High Court.

We are also informed that the FSPO will issue the 2019 overview of complaints shortly, in March 2020, which will include a breakdown of all complaints closed in 2019, an analysis of those complaints and a report on named financial service providers.  

The FSPO database of legally binding decisions now provides us with a valuable tool in that it holds the full text of more than 600 of the FSPO’s written decisions in relation to complaints against financial service providers since January 2018.  The FSPO states that it will continue to add decisions on an ongoing basis, including in the coming weeks.  

The FSPO deals with a wide range of complaints relating to insurance, banking, credit facilities and investments as well as pensions.  In the recent Press Release, it has listed specific examples of directions made by the Ombudsman, Ger Deering, in 2019, such as compensation of €15,000 to an individual after a lender failed to update his Irish Credit Bureau rating and compensation of €35,000 to a couple after a bank overcharged them interest and failed to clearly state the correct interest rate on their loan. 

The FSPO’s published digest of legally binding decisions includes, as mentioned above, 33 legally binding decisions split into the following sectors:  banking, insurance, investment, and pensions.  The digest of decisions relating to the insurance industry sets out the factual circumstances of each complaint, including the following examples:

  1. a car insurance policy being cancelled because of an incorrect date recorded for a driver’s licence;
  2. a dispute regarding the value of stolen property;
  3. a car insurance policy being cancelled due to non-disclosure of an accident; and
  4. a rejection of an insurance claim for damage caused by burst pipes in the home. 

Publication by the FSPO of its digest of decisions from 2019 is welcomed and provides transparency as to the processes and procedures of the FSPO as well as the factors considered in order to reach each legally binding decision. 

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More