ARTICLE
14 August 2024

The Impact Of The Jan Vishwas Act, 2023: Patents, Trademarks & Copyrights

NN
Naik Naik & Company

Contributor

Established in 2004, Naik Naik & Co. started out as a niche media practice which has metamorphosed into a full-service law firm. Headquartered in Mumbai with a pan-India presence, we advise and perform across all aspects of corporate, disputes, banking and finance, and intellectual property law. Our sectoral focus is our differentiator and we can boast of strong industry sector expertise for over two decades. Our practice is anchored in quality service, professionalism, and integrity.
The Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 ("Amendment"), which received presidential assent on August 11, 2023, signifies a significant shift in India's approach to Intellectual Property Rights
India Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Jan Vishwas (Amendment of Provisions) Act, 2023 ("Amendment"), which received presidential assent on August 11, 2023, signifies a significant shift in India's approach to Intellectual Property Rights ("IPR"). The Amendment aims to enhance the ease of doing business and promote innovations while introducing substantial amendments to existing IPR laws.

The Amendment emerges from the government's continuous efforts to create a more conducive business environment in India. The Amendment is part of a series of reforms aimed at simplifying and streamlining the regulatory framework governing businesses, with the ultimate goal of fostering economic growth, encouraging entrepreneurship, and attracting investment.

The core objective of the Amendment is to decriminalize minor offenses and reduce the complexity of compliance requirements by introducing more straightforward regulatory provisions. This approach is in line with the government's broader vision of making India a global business hub by minimizing bureaucratic hurdles and enhancing transparency.

This article analyses the changes introduced to the IPR laws through this Amendment, comparing the old and new provisions to provide a comprehensive understanding of their implications.

Key Amendments In IPR Laws

The amendments brought about by the Amendment can be classified into three main areas: patents, trademarks, and copyrights. Each of these categories has experienced notable modifications aimed at simplifying procedures and strengthening protection measures.

1. Patents Act, 1970

The Amendment introduces important updates to the Patents Act, 1970, focusing on decriminalizing certain offenses and increasing penalties for patent-related violations. A major change is in Section 120, where the maximum fine for unauthorized patent claims has been raised from ₹1 lakh to ₹10 lakh. Additionally, a daily fine can now be imposed for ongoing misrepresentation. Section 122 has also been updated to specify penalties for failing to provide required information, with fines up to ₹1 lakh and additional daily penalties for continued non-compliance. These changes aim to create a more transparent and effective patent system, bringing it in line with global practices.

The Amendment also introduces Section 124A, which empowers the Controller to levy penalties for defaults while ensuring that the defaulting party also has the opportunity to present their case. This shift from criminal penalties to substantial monetary fines reflects a broader trend towards minimizing imprisonment for minor infractions. Additionally, the Amendment tackles the issue of false information by replacing potential jail time with significant financial penalties. Overall, these changes are designed to streamline the patent process, encourage innovation, and enhance the ease of doing business in India while maintaining high standards of compliance.

2. Trademarks Act, 1999

The Amendment introduces significant changes to the Trade Marks Act, 1999, primarily aimed at decriminalizing minor offences and enhancing penalties for serious violations. One of the key changes is the replacement of imprisonment with monetary fines for various offenses. Previously, Sections 106, 108, and 109 included criminal penalties for trademark-related offences, including imprisonment for misrepresentation. However, these sections have now been removed, and imprisonment has been replaced by financial penalties. For instance, Section 107 now imposes a fine instead of imprisonment for falsely representing trademarks The previous punishment of imprisonment for up to three years has been substituted with a financial penalty based on a percentage of total sales or gross receipts. This shift aims to reduce the compliance burden on businesses while still holding offenders accountable through substantial fines.

Additionally, the Amendment removes several provisions that previously imposed criminal penalties, such as those related to the incorrect descriptions of business addresses associated with the Trade Marks Office and the falsification of entries in the trademark register. The introduction of new provisions for adjudication and appeals further streamlines the process, allowing for penalties to be assessed by designated officers rather than through criminal prosecution. Overall, these amendments aim to promote ease of doing business in India while ensuring that trademark rights are still adequately protected.

3. Copyright Act, 1957

The Amendment brings substantial changes to the Copyright Act, 1957, focusing on decriminalizing certain offences and adjusting penalties to foster a more business-friendly environment. Key amendments include changes to Section 63, which previously mandated imprisonment of six months to three years for copyright infringement. The amendment replaces this with increased monetary fines, thus reclassifying copyright infringement into a civil liability rather than a criminal offense. Similarly, Section 64 has been revised to eliminate imprisonment for companies found liable for copyright violations, reinforcing the civil nature of these offences and emphasizing financial penalties instead.

Additionally, the Amendment enhances enforcement under Section 67 by allowing authorities to seize infringing copies without needing to pursue criminal charges, thus streamlining the enforcement process. Similarly, Section 70 has also been updated to impose fines for specific acts of copyright infringement, such as unauthorized reproduction or distribution, instead of imprisonment. Collectively, these amendments aim to simplify the enforcement of copyright laws, reduce the burden on the judicial system, and encourage compliance among businesses while protecting copyright holders' rights. By emphasizing civil penalties, the Amendment promotes respect for intellectual property and strengthens overall governance in the sector.

Implications Of The Amendments

The legislation has profound implications for India's business and innovation landscape. It simplifies regulatory processes, reduces compliance burdens, and enhances the ease of doing business. The focus on digital processes and simplified procedures will make it easier for businesses to manage their IPR portfolios, leading to more effective protection and enforcement of rights.

By decriminalizing minor offenses and substituting imprisonment with monetary penalties, the Amendment removes bureaucratic obstacles for startups, fostering a more innovative environment and impacting intellectual property law in areas such as copyrights, patents, and trademarks.

The Amendment promotes a trust-based governance model, encouraging businesses to engage with the legal framework without fearing harsh penalties for minor technical or procedural errors. This approach aims to build a more cooperative relationship between the government and businesses. Simplified regulations and a more predictable business environment are likely to make India a more attractive destination for foreign investors. The Amendment aligns with global best practices in business regulation, which can enhance India's reputation as a business-friendly destination.

The sector-specific amendments introduced by the Amendment can provide a significant boost to industries that are critical to India's economic growth. By addressing the unique regulatory challenges faced by these sectors, the Amendment can foster innovation, competitiveness, and efficiency.

Overall, the Amendment signifies a significant change in India's approach towards IPR, aiming to balance robust protections with a more supportive business climate.

Conclusion

The Amendment represents a significant step forward in India's ongoing efforts to create a more business-friendly environment. By decriminalizing minor offenses, rationalizing penalties, and simplifying compliance requirements, the Amendment is likely to reduce the regulatory burden on businesses and encourage greater economic activity.
However, the success of the Amendment will depend on its effective implementation and the ability of businesses, regulators, and the judiciary to adapt to the new framework. While there are challenges and criticisms, the overall impact of the Amendment is expected to be positive, contributing to India's economic growth and global competitiveness.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More