CD Paris, October 14, 2024, Order On Application Pursuant To R.262.1(b) RoP, UPC_CFI_255/2023, CC_584916/2023 And CC_585030/2023

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
The court reaffirmed the general principle that the register of the Unified Patent Court and the proceedings before it are open to the public, as stipulated in Art. 10 (1) UPCA...
Germany Intellectual Property

1. Key takeaways

Principle of Public Access Upheld

The court reaffirmed the general principle that the register of the Unified Patent Court and the proceedings before it are open to the public, as stipulated in Art. 10 (1) UPCA and Rule 262.1 (b) RoP, unless the balance of interests involved is such that they are to be kept confidential. The court granted the applicant's request for access to all pleadings and evidence submitted in the proceedings, even though the applicant's interest in the documents was considered to be only "generic" and not "specific" considering i.a. that the integrity of the proceedings was not affected since they had already come to an end. The court reasoned that the applicant's preparatory activities to enter the market concerned by the patent at issue were sufficient to establish an interest in accessing the requested documents.

Leave to Appeal Granted

Recognizing the need for developing consistent case law regarding public access to the register, the court granted the respondents leave to appeal the order granting access. This decision highlights the importance of clarifying the application of Rule 262.1 (b) RoP and Art. 45 UPCA, particularly when balancing the right to public access with other interests, such as the protection of confidential information.

Suspension of the Order's Effect

In light of the potential for irreversible consequences, the court suspended the effect of its order granting access until the deadline for filing an appeal expires or, if an appeal is filed, until the conclusion of the appeal proceedings. This approach aims to safeguard the parties' interests while the legal issues surrounding public access are further clarified in the appeal.

2. Division

CD Paris

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_255/2023, CC_584916/2023 and CC_585030/2023; App_33486/2024, 33487/2024 and 33489/2024

4. Type of proceedings

Application pursuant to R. 262.1(b) RoP

5. Parties

Applicant: SWAT Medical AB (Applicant)

Respondents:

Meril Italy S.r.l. (Defendant)

Edwards Lifesciences Corporation (Defendant)

Meril Gmbh (Counterclaimant)

Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd. (Counterclaimant)

6. Patent(s)

EP3646825

7. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 5 RoP, Art. 24(1) (c) UPCA

UPC_CFI_2252023_CD Paris_October_14_2024 Download

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More