ARTICLE
20 August 2024

LD Vienna, July 30, 2024, Procedural Order Concerning Security For Costs Of Proceedings, UPC_CFI_33/2024

BP
Bardehle Pagenberg

Contributor

BARDEHLE PAGENBERG combines the expertise of attorneys-at-law and patent attorneys. As one of the largest IP firms in Europe, BARDEHLE PAGENBERG advises in all fields of Intellectual Property, including all procedures before the patent and trademark offices as well as litigation before the courts through all instances.
Intervener: Chainzone Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd
Germany Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Key takeaways

Sufficient interest for intervention to be admissible

Purchase of accused product establishes interest for intervention to be admissible

Intervener may request security for costs

2. Division

LD Vienna

3. UPC number

UPC_CFI_33/2024

4. Type of proceedings

Infringement Proceedings

5. Parties

Claimant: SWARCO Futurit Verkehrssignalsysteme GmbH

Defendant: STRABAG Infrastructure & Safety Solutions GmbH

Intervener: Chainzone Technology (Foshan) Co., Ltd.

6. Patent(s)

EP 2 643 717

7. Body of legislation / Rules

Rule 158, 313, 314 RoP, Art. 69 UPCA

To view the full article please click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More